- Jul 19, 2008
- 1,085
- 13
Nike..so much better
Nike Retro Quality versus Jordan Quality
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by jrock78,
- Start date
- Jan 20, 2008
- 342
- 44
Premium Nike retro's have some decent quality and the really premium stuff like the Patta Air Max 1's are insane good quality.....can't say thesame about any Jordan's!
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,582
- 21,771
this
but my 2 cents... for JB it seems as tho the quality of shoes JB KNOWS its gonna sell is crap.... them kicks they not so sure about have better quality thansaid kicks
nike retro has been pretty good cept for them am95s and bo jacksons.
- Nov 10, 2007
- 728
- 10
It depends on which shoe, but jordan number line (retro) are fashion shoes to me. You just cant ball the same as ogs.
- Oct 30, 2009
- 4,151
- 2,495
word, kinfoe... i love my griffs and pipps... they feel so solid....
i'ma have to second that, kinfoe.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 4,996
- 91
This shouldn't even be A Question Seriously. I've from my purchases this year Penny's, Barkley's and Griffey's!
- Nov 17, 2007
- 1,849
- 49
presto > airmax
- Feb 11, 2006
- 2,210
- 11
They both suck but we still buy so it will only get worse.
- Dec 9, 2006
- 8,879
- 454
definitely nike retro > jordan brand retro quality.
- Sep 6, 2008
- 321
- 10
idk i would have to say that the quality in jordan brand has slipped way passed nike because when i seen the retro XII black and red up close the paint lookedlike a kindergarden kid put it on them. it was all blotched up and the 23 on the back of the shoe was a different color red from the rest of the shoe and thenthe finger loop on the back of the shoe was uneven! but the penny's that i got were perfectly straight i ain seen nun wrong wit dem since i had dem. gottado better JB
- Jun 28, 2008
- 461
- 10
Nike retro quality isn't great but Jordan quality is terrible. .... smh
- Apr 30, 2005
- 192
- 10
so sad, butt so true
- Jul 29, 2008
- 2,156
- 12
to me they the same, i wanna give nike the benefit of the doubt though. retro quality sucks now a days
- Feb 3, 2005
- 2,974
- 10
true, can't forget the Deion's. My most disappointed retro. I will never forgive nike for that
- Jan 24, 2009
- 892
- 10
Fairly to NT, but I'm old enough to know what shoes WERE like and what they are now. Over the course of the year, I've sent 3 pairs of retro shoesback to Nike for faults in production, and the production date was less than 2 years old. Now I've got 3 vouchers from Nike to use at their website, but Idon't even know if I want to waste my time buying an updated version of a shoe I once had back in '91 in 8th grade. In those days you could run thoseinto the ground, and the soles fell off. Now they crack and fall off after a few trips to the store. Just a sign of the times and I doubt things will changemuch.
- Jan 5, 2009
- 1,596
- 11
Ehh... when my CDP XII's came in the mail, i thought they were a pair of b-grades.
Worse of all the XII's released this past year... for sure.
To say where JB has desended to would be trite, so i'm not going to be a horse that is beyond dead.
So of course, Nike Retro > JB.
(but what i did notice on the Penny II's, the Atlantics were the most flimsy-seeming of the OG colorways
and the 3M striping was half the size compared to the black/blue/whites. If you own both pairs, check
it out).
The Griffs, ATC II's and Zoom Flight 95 Kidds were on point, for sure.
.
Worse of all the XII's released this past year... for sure.
To say where JB has desended to would be trite, so i'm not going to be a horse that is beyond dead.
So of course, Nike Retro > JB.
(but what i did notice on the Penny II's, the Atlantics were the most flimsy-seeming of the OG colorways
and the 3M striping was half the size compared to the black/blue/whites. If you own both pairs, check
it out).
The Griffs, ATC II's and Zoom Flight 95 Kidds were on point, for sure.
.
