- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,638
- 8,179
Exactly. This is what happens when they make stupid changes for no reason. People legit forget how the shoe is supposed to look.
Nike Air Jordan Retro 3 OG “Fire Red” 2022
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Jordanbball,
- Start date
- Feb 12, 2014
- 5,308
- 6,946
True, but still seems like what we're getting is clearly much lighter....Not that any of us care to any extend that we won't cop, but just pointing out the facts.
Versus 2022:
Not a criticism per se; just an observation for the fun of the game ;-).
Versus 2022:
Not a criticism per se; just an observation for the fun of the game ;-).
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
That could just be age too, they got darker over time.True, but still seems like what we're getting is clearly much lighter....Not that any of us care to any extend that we won't cop, but just pointing out the facts.
Versus 2022:
Not a criticism per se; just an observation for the fun of the game ;-).
TipsyMcStagga
formerly kod843
- Aug 1, 2011
- 12,479
- 15,109
Yup could be lighting and/or filters as well
- Oct 23, 2006
- 428
- 291
It’s funny how thick the lines on the second pair are, close to the cement print they use now.True, but still seems like what we're getting is clearly much lighter....Not that any of us care to any extend that we won't cop, but just pointing out the facts.
Versus 2022:
Not a criticism per se; just an observation for the fun of the game ;-).
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,311
- 18,154
Same dopes who think low-cut patent on XIs is how it's supposed to be.
True, but still seems like what we're getting is clearly much lighter....Not that any of us care to any extend that we won't cop, but just pointing out the facts.
Versus 2022:
Not a criticism per se; just an observation for the fun of the game ;-).
It could be all that, but did any of us truly expect them to match the color exactly? At least this is better than the previous retros--not that that's saying much.
My No. 1 complaint about retro IIIs going back more than 20 years now (along with some of the terrible shapes they've given us throughout those years). It's not going to stop me from buying a pair of these and enjoying the hell out of them, but it's such an obvious detail they could no doubt easily correct. It's triply annoying when these clowns use the correct style of elephant-print lines on some of the damn retro boxes. I mean, talk about a troll job. Gotta love when the box matches the OGs but the shoes somehow can't do the same. Total jokers working over there, man
- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,638
- 8,179
I see a huge difference in the 07/13 pairs vs a slight difference in the 2022. I really just don’t see a reason to complain about these. These are about as good as one could hope for and it should be obvious to anyone that they’re head and shoulders above every other FR3 retro.
AJ4s are still a mess and definitely need a lot of attention. These don’t.
- Aug 11, 2015
- 9,548
- 13,880
Good
I can get these hopefully without issues
- Mar 27, 2007
- 4,336
- 7,492
Somebody at Nike was like:
"Why don't we just do the elephant print different every time, that'll really piss'em off. "
"Why don't we just do the elephant print different every time, that'll really piss'em off.
"
- Jul 20, 2012
- 4,903
- 6,757
Im in, ill get the left overs that yall dont want lol
- Sep 5, 2000
- 3,701
- 7,815
Looks weird without the Jumpman on the heel tab. Why did JB change it? Gonna have to pass on these.
- Jul 20, 2012
- 1,104
- 1,478
Im usually pretty hard on OG retro releases but these are pretty damned nice!
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
No it’s not. You’ll be enjoying these Hugh Hefner style.
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,650
- 23,675
The dark ep sucked. The new version is much better . At least we can see defined ep on this pair. Is that not what everyone wanted? The 2013 was not even entertained when they dropped. These new ones are a must have.
- Aug 11, 2015
- 9,548
- 13,880
Once I get multiples in hand those 2013 are going right on the on bay no question asked 
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,493
- 36,889
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,648
- 9,742
- Feb 12, 2014
- 5,308
- 6,946
Perhaps. Though I thought generally things fade/lighten over time...heh ;-).
- Dec 7, 2018
- 2,267
- 5,926
Dark, light, thick, thin, y’all are copping regardless.
dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,958
- 20,947
Oxidation and age tends to make things darker over time in most cases. Regardless the 2022 is intended to look like the OG which it does. Also lighting plays a huge factor in those comparison pics up there too (2022 pic taken outside while the OG pic is clearly taken inside). I think people are just subconsciously thinking the EP should be darker because that’s what they’ve unfortunately been used to seeing on the FR3 all these years due to JBs botched retros.
- Aug 2, 2014
- 2,252
- 4,970
Wasn't that excited at first but the more I see...the more I like. No complaints here....Double up.
- Sep 20, 2007
- 13,242
- 14,723
Might actually be in on these ngl
- Jun 17, 2006
- 44,219
- 2,552
Counting down the days.
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
Until the pushback.
- Jul 14, 2003
- 7,852
- 4,891
I know he's surrounded by big men but if this shot doesnt sum up how far ahead Nike was in the brick shoe game I dunno what does
