- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,440
- 11,918
Did you just call the Bred 1s ugly?Wont work because I have no Ugly Jordan 1's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you just call the Bred 1s ugly?Wont work because I have no Ugly Jordan 1's
Thx for checking famMine do not have the "B". LN4 pair from Nike Mall Of America.
Just not a fan of 1's at all.Did you just call the Bred 1s ugly?
Thx for checking fam. Here’s an up close shot of what I’m trippin about. Btw, this pair from Shoe Palace Glendale.
In my opinion, the build quality today is generally much better than it was in the 90s. A lot of the materials and shapes of the shoes seemed nicer back then, but I lost count of how many pairs of shoes I had to return. It was usually due to the outsole peeling off, or threads coming undone. I learned quickly back when I first really got into Nikes and Jordans (around late 1989/early 1990) to always inspect them closely in the store to look for loose stitching and poorly glued/attached outsoles. Doing that least reduced the chances I'd have to return them down the road. I've told the story here before about being in college in 95/96 and going to buy the OG carbon-fiber Zoom Flight 95s. I had to have the dude bring out literally every pair he had in my size to find a left shoe and a right shoe that didn't have their outsoles not glued on fully in a spot or two. People were looking at me curiously as I was sitting there on the bench, surrounded by a giant stack of Zoom Flight 95s
When I take a close look at the shoes I buy today, I almost never see these fundamental types of construction issues where I think the shoes are going to fall apart. The stuff we talk about straight out of the box nowadays is almost always purely cosmetic.
All things considered from what I can see in your pic, I'd keep the pair on the left. It has the thinner-line EP and the height of the toe EP on the left and right shoes looks about the same. The one shoe from the other pair has the ideal EP height, but the other one doesn't, and both have the thicker EP lines.LOL got it. Thank you! Yeah, that one has a shape flaw, but to me, it's just standard manufacturer flaws I can accept. Nike/Jordan is a fast-fashion company anyway; this type of stuff was expected. As long as I didn't receive pANdA dUnK LoW quality, it's good to me!
These jokes flyin all over your head my guyHaha who is DUKE and WTF is up with my pair fam. Missed the joke about a burner account? Sorry to disappoint, but this my only one? Think you got me twisted with someone else.
I definitely like my EU pair much better than my SNKRS PAIR. Leather is wayyy softer and more tumbled on my EU pair than my SNKRS.
Elephant print on SNKRS pair is over exaggerated
My SNKRS pair feels “cheaper” in quality. Also, the cushioning around the sock-liner is softer than the EU pair.
EU Wins this round
Materials used back then may have been better, but overall build quality and craftsmanship wasn’t at all. Just ask how many dudes on here used to have to send pairs back to Nike for a replacement.
Boy I'd hate to tell you Nike themselves proved that is a lie this year. A LOT of their shoes this year have had TERRIBLE QC. And its been proven that they use cheaper grades of leather while stating the materials are "closer to OG i.e., Georgetown 1s when its the same leather as a cheap AF1"
I wasn't alive back then but i'm sure the people who had the OGs know the leather and QC was MUCH better than now, even if we only have pictures and some videos to compare. There's a reason OGs are high collectibles and not recent retros.
The stores were so consumer-friendly back then when it came to returns and standing behind the products they sold, and what the expectations were for quality and durability/longevity. I wore my first Js, the fire red IVs, for probably five months straight as literally the only pair of sneakers I had other than my on-court basketball shoes. One day, I noticed there were cracks formed INSIDE the outsole flex grooves, where at that point the rubber was thinnest and flexed the most with every step. Even to my eighth-grade eye, it seemed like an unavoidable reality due to how those grooves and the outsole rubber were designed. Well, my dad said it was BS for a pair of five-month old $110 shoes to have that problem, and we returned them with NO problem. I got the original white/blue ... damn, now I can't remember the full name, as a free replacement. They were the latest Air Flights, mid-cut with a kinda puffy soft fabric tongue with the FLIGHT script stitched into it. No visible air. Blue midsole. AYE, it'll come to me. But anyway, point is, good luck trying that move today100%! I had pre-mature wearing usually holes forming in the heel sock liner. I returned my BM5s after 10 months of daily wear and they gave me the Black Infrared 6s for free. I returned those after 8-10 months for the same problem, and they gave me the Bordeaux 7s for free. B/c 7s have the neoprene liner, no holes developed. I would have done the same with my WC4s back then, but I painted them black so had to actually buy the BM5s...SMH.
You the real MVP. Thx fam.
My mind was so wrapped over the B Stamp. Letting **** fly!These jokes flyin all over your head my guy
Random question, but the difference between gym red vs fire red is how wide? I ask because I've always wondered plus I copped a gym red Jordan hoodie from the Nike site. It was on sale for $40.
I'd say gym red is noticeably darker and closer to varsity red. Fire red is lighter & brighter.