- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,743
- 24,136
There is no heel bump at all.Those are fake.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no heel bump at all.Those are fake.
Maybe its the angle, but those look way offThose are fake.
Maybe it's fakes from 99?Maybe its the angle, but those look way off
When did the white-purple ever get released in that shape? I would say they were fake, the area near the netting and laces looks wrong.and here are some black cement 4s for comparison. 4s today are practically a mid
take up your complaints with footlockerWhen did the white-purple ever get released in that shape? I would say they were fake, the area near the netting and laces looks wrong.
they're from 1999 buddy
I assume your not talking about the guy that actually owed a pair of 99s.a clown is born
a clown is born
I assume your not talking about the guy that actually owed a pair of 99s.
Correct me if I am wrong. But is there some 99s that had the next version of the size tag in them? The version that had the date touching the barcode. The fakes in that period of time clearly had a separation between the two.Ya don't say....
Hmm at the time you had the 4s coming outta 2 factories being Taiwan and China. The Taiwan cut had the actual date 99 printed on the tag. Doesnt help that mine are crumbling and the durabuck is flaking compared to 1978s pair. But it explains the inconsistencies between different factories. Remarkably the midsole is intact and they're okay for grocery runs. Fakes at the time?? People had better things to do with their lives.Correct me if I am wrong. But is there some 99s that had the next version of the size tag in them? The version that had the date touching the barcode. The fakes in that period of time clearly had a separation between the two.
Just because they’re old doesn’t make them real. Those are super obvious fakes and you’re on here getting defensive and playing yourself.a clown is born
Correct me if I am wrong. But is there some 99s that had the next version of the size tag in them? The version that had the date touching the barcode. The fakes in that period of time clearly had a separation between the two.
Somewhere between Jan of 99 to April 99 they changed the tag style. All the WC4s look to have the newer at time version.Yeah I'd have to do some digging as I don't remember that particular tagging for these.
rafbuddy where you at? Post up a pic of your tags.
But seriously, your pair 1000% fake. Only takes 1-2 seconds of looking. The overall shape is way off at immediate glance. As JRepp23 pointed out, the most obvious difference is the lack of heel bump on your pair. The netting is way too small, panel around the toe is way too high, etc.
We/NTers have been denouncing the pair you posted for literally the past 20 years. Can spot it right away.
ill post some pics up once I get backYeah I'd have to do some digging as I don't remember that particular tagging for these.
rafbuddy where you at? Post up a pic of your tags.
But seriously, your pair 1000% fake. Only takes 1-2 seconds of looking. The overall shape is way off at immediate glance. As JRepp23 pointed out, the most obvious difference is the lack of heel bump on your pair. The netting is way too small, panel around the toe is way too high, etc.
We/NTers have been denouncing the pair you posted for literally the past 20 years. Can spot it right away.
Ok, what year did those come out? Or, show me the tag, I'll apologize if I'm wrong.take up your complaints with footlocker
I'm in the middle but the back of the tongue has me thrown off in the comparison pic. Do you the receipt?
Appreciate the heads up. Gonna keep both phones handy all day so hopefully it’ll be an early double up.Hey brothers keep your eyes spelled fire reds are supposed to shock drop tomorrow or this week for sure.
I saw it and had to share man I know we all need these.Appreciate the heads up. Gonna keep both phones handy all day so hopefully it’ll be an early double up.