- Jan 2, 2010
- 82,910
- 118,535
These are...the IV's.
Meant V's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are...the IV's.
Just means NA imo. The shape is gonna be awful for sure.NT, what other shoes have released with official “OG Form” ?
how does this differ from the supposed remaster shoes of the last few years? VIs have been decent since the 2019 Infra. But IVs have continued to be mostly kaka
Kobe approves
You aren't missing anything with those 2012 joints, I wore them a few times. And I can't get down with the materials and the shape. I run access them time to time and I still can't bring myself to wear themIn.
Always wanted these. Never got to own the mars or the 2012 pair
From the pics of originals I see, the EP wasnt that dark on the OG. I've never own Fire Red 3s for that reason, the black EP is trashNever been a fan of the Fire Red 3s (never liked the look of the dark, almost black elephant print on those), but these are a must IMO. Especially with how they’re currently executing the shape better on 4s, and with these most likely going to have NA branding.
Kinda weird to be a fan of Jordans then since the most iconic colorways are white/black/red combos.Passing on this like most other Js this colorway... doesn't do anything for me.
The last 2012 retro of these were str8 Garbage! So Nike you better give us a "true OG" upper, soft genuine Leather w/Nike Air", the plastic "Wings" on each side must have the OG distance from the midsole. and for Xrist Sake GET THE TOE BOX CORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just my opinion...…….
Fire reds weren't?OG's were Durabuck though.
Fire reds weren't?