- 22,189
- 31,943
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
am i the only one that thinks this shape is on point?Look again.
no banana toe
spacing under the wing tab and midsole
mesh looks right.
im praying they look like this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
am i the only one that thinks this shape is on point?Look again.
I think they look on point ALLOT!! but with that being said the most recent picture of the cements has to be between a size 7.5-9, look how short the toe box is. View media item 1846983am i the only one that thinks this shape is on point?
no banana toe
spacing under the wing tab and midsole
mesh looks right.
im praying they look like this
am i the only one that thinks this shape is on point?
no banana toe
spacing under the wing tab and midsole
mesh looks right.
im praying they look like this
HEY LOOK HERE PAL..based on the official photo from Nike the space under the wing looks wider. just wait for more official photos people. all those pics on foot and not from legit sources just please ignore them. it's not like you guys won't be buying them AND if you are not going to buy them after seeing the official photos then why the hell are you guys still in this thread? it's ridiculous at this point to still bi tch about the shape and what not when NIKE already unveil the shoes. just sit back relax and wait for them to come out.
View media item 1837243
am i the only one that thinks this shape is on point?Look again.
View media item 1846866
no banana toe
spacing under the wing tab and midsole
mesh looks right.
im praying they look like this
Exactly.. we all know regardless everyone will still buy the shoeI usually don't get into all the fuss about OG vs New retros...I feel like only elitists care about that...but the shape between both almost looks like the new model is a .5 version of the original...completely different, the shoe looks less bulky and finer...some people like it, some don't...but the shape is definitely not even remotely close
Maybe it's just me but I like the '15 shape better ... the bulkiness may be more comfortable on the '99 but it doesn't look as good ... IMO [emoji]128080[/emoji]Look again.
View media item 1846866
REPPED
4 bills for tumbled leather that used to be standard and not premium. They off that dog food
JB is flat out lazy and if thy wanted, the shape could EASILY be on point....Thy choose to cut corners and this is nothin new and on the other hand is disappointing because i know thy could give us exactly wht we all want, tht pic up there dosnt look so bad and much better then the 2012s...One day will get exactly wht we've been expecting years on down the road...lol...
You'll have to pay $270 for those someday down the road as you say and what's crazy about that is they'll revert to the Jumpman for that release. The shape will be correct though. Lol! Lord help us when they finally decide to release an NA version with the OG shape. I don't think my pockets are that deep.
That ski jump toe box [emoji]127938[/emoji][emoji]127935[/emoji]View media item 1848088 2012 pair
Shape no longer concerns me for these. Not as big a concern as compared to the 7s or 11s. Just hope these joints are comfortable.
"The Air Jordan 4 See-Ment".
![]()