whiplashtw03
Banned
- 4,934
- 2,215
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And childish. I'm sitting here making a friendly comment about his Nike focus group reselling comment and dude comes back with a display of immaturity once again. Why am I not surprised lolPetty af
And childish. I'm sitting here making a friendly comment about his Nike focus group reselling comment and dude comes back with a display of immaturity once again. Why am I not surprised lol
Couldn't agree more
And childish. I'm sitting here making a friendly comment about his Nike focus group reselling comment and dude comes back with a display of immaturity once again. Why am I not surprised lol
you could always wear thick socks like elites or something
It's because 10.5 feels big to me, I like my 1s to be a .5 lower.
None of those options seems like viable solutions to kill reselling.Bunch of uniformed people him here. I went to a focus group Nike held and the topic was to kill reselling. The whole remaster thing was nothing more than a jig to charge more and mass produce.
Nothing Nike has done has been limited like before. They're flooding the market to kill resellers.
If they sold Black Toe 1's all year around for about $220, the resell game would die. Point blank.
People are paying $220 for worse Jordan products....................................................So would the retail market! Lol ain't nobody paying 220 retail on 1s regularly.
I don't believe it would lose it's appeal, maybe what you COULD do is seasonal wears. 11s in the Fall/Winter, 1s Spring/Summer.If they sold Breds/Banned's, Black Toes, Chicago's, Royals or any other hyped Jordan 1 at its current retail of $160 year around it would impair the resell market, but then again the sneaker runs the risk of losing its appeal amongst a sometimes casual and fickle consumer base.
Finding that middle ground is what JB/Nike can't simply seem to do right as far as the masses are concerned. At the end of the day they'll err on the side of caution and will consistently leverage towards limitedness, hype, mass produced product with shoddy materials, etc. if it continues to peak interest and drive their bottom line.
A somewhat controversial one at that. Similar reason Nike dropped Pacquiao after he created a stir with his off-base comments. Nike cares very deeply about how their brand is promoted and marketed to the masses with regards to the company's core values.
Nike could have made a BILLION off Kanye West, the brand didn't want a "rapper" as a face of the company.
They wanted to continue their relationship as a collaboration.
Troll?
I'm the petty one? Should I post the screen shots of your pm again?
I don't like, mess or eff with you. You speak eloquently about nothing you know about.
You sign a nda at these things so i can't speak on anything until Nike announces it.
I hinted the draw before it released. I just told you things are going to change yet again.
Nike and ftl were in the group and Nike pretty much implied that they forced ftl to make an app because of all the complaints from their raffle system.
Nike has been puffing their chests to vendors thru more and more retail spaces.
We as consumers ar stupid. We cry about $190 retail but $200 was average resell on grs when hype was high.
nike wants to audit because they make more money selling thru their own retail spaces.
Community stores are going to start having release day product like other accounts and not just operating like outlets.
They care about the brand more than people being able to buy them fairly, IMO.
A somewhat controversial one at that. Similar reason Nike dropped Pacquiao after he created a stir with his off-base comments. Nike cares very deeply about how their brand is promoted and marketed to the masses with regards to the company's core values.
They care about the brand more than people being able to buy them fairly, IMO.
Makes 100% complete business sense.
mine feel and look like the 2013 BW's
Not bad. But why pay $185 for slightly used 2013 pair when you can find a better quality 2016 pair for roughly the same price?