Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)

How many pairs will you be copping?

  • "1" is all I need.

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • 2. One to rock, One to stock.

    Votes: 8 47.1%
  • 3+. I need to hoard for no valid reason.

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • 0. No OG Box? PASS.

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • Total voters
    17
:lol I thought UA was under armor... I remember in like 03 it was "varaints" then it was replica now its unauthorized, whats the next word?
 
Replicas (fakes) are completely different materials used in some factory. Unauthorized, many times, are the same nike materials being used, at the same factory Nike uses. Nike shuts down a production run, and shady Chinese factories have materials left over, and keep making shoes, and sell them on the grey market. There is a difference, but neither of which are authorized Nike releases.
 
So what if there are UA banned 1s and UA frags? I imagine the quality would be 'amazing' as you guys make it out to be.

Tempted? :lol
 
They don't have HQ fake banneds they do have frags but most who are good with 1s can tell the difference

Fakes are getting better tho as you can see with the chicagos and even HQ SBB
 
Listen if ain't new it's used

If it ain't real it's fake


Almost?


You never had your car
 
So what if there are UA banned 1s and UA frags? I imagine the quality would be 'amazing' as you guys make it out to be.

Tempted? :lol

Certain UA's I've seen had really good quality and were comfortable.. Buuuuut it's just wack to rock UAs and try to make people think your wearing legit pairs.
 
Smh at wearing UAs

This dude takin bout they were comfortable
 
Replicas (fakes) are completely different materials used in some factory. Unauthorized, many times, are the same nike materials being used, at the same factory Nike uses. Nike shuts down a production run, and shady Chinese factories have materials left over, and keep making shoes, and sell them on the grey market. There is a difference, but neither of which are authorized Nike releases.

Yea but now the term issued too loosely. People slapping UA to justify their fake shoes they brought of some cheap Chinese website with the little photo of the call center lady in the corner for like 125$.

Scream I never do fakes I have a plug over seas that gets me back stock the extra aka UA's smh....

To me retailer or fake. Nike quality may not be the best but I'm not taking some hey we have the same materials pitch for 50-100 less.
 
They don't have HQ fake banneds they do have frags but most who are good with 1s can tell the difference

Fakes are getting better tho as you can see with the chicagos and even HQ SBB

what you do with them UA bred ***?

Threw me away

A few NTers tried to cop em off me :lol
Threw them away? LOL I don't belee that for a sec.

I got my money back, what did you want me to do :lol I wouldn't wear em even tho they looked like legit 2001s. I'll admit those fakes were damn good SRS
 
Ebay is filling up with sketchy pairs now. Glad I got mine early, ain't mad what I paid ($380).
 
I love busting out the cats on IG with fugazis. Who remembers the cat that posted that pic of someone's surgically operated foot in the Yeezy 2 thread saying if you wear fakes your feet will end up like this. I still get lulz thinking about that
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom