DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,505
- 53,690
****NFL Survivor and Pick Em Groups - 2022 Season**** CONGRATS TENNHOUSE!
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by DeadsetAce,
- Start date
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,954
- 30,398
Wow 
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,033
- 10,002
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 59,462
- 28,549
To be fair the Bengals should’ve won like three different times, and in addition to that, Burrow had 5 TO’s that would’ve made it a blowout. Let me back in.
- Sep 17, 2013
- 7,521
- 5,156
I made it to week 2. Haha.
I’m taking burrow this week
I’m taking burrow this week
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,954
- 30,398
Leaning the same.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,505
- 53,690
in the event that everyone is out by week 4 or something, we can reset it. but week 1 is usually the toughest
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 59,462
- 28,549
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 59,462
- 28,549
Technically the Week 4 winner is the winner, but yeah we should
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 107,147
- 197,976
Reaching your personal goals
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 59,462
- 28,549
There’s two people left not done with Week 3
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 59,462
- 28,549
Who is My Impressive Pick Set and My Phenomenal Pick Set and why are they not the same person?
- Oct 28, 2006
- 12,488
- 9,564
Who is My Impressive Pick Set and My Phenomenal Pick Set and why are they not the same person?
Hindu Daddy
- Dec 23, 2006
- 6,571
- 1,089
I'm phenomenal
- Dec 23, 2006
- 6,571
- 1,089
- Dec 14, 2001
- 12,426
- 2,239
week 4 winner
- Dec 23, 2006
- 6,571
- 1,089
Well yeah there were only 2 people left week 4....I'm the only one left now unless I'm missing something?
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,505
- 53,690
well congrats, man 
should we reset it for fun?
should we reset it for fun?
- Jan 19, 2002
- 23,476
- 5,603
Packers almost screwed me up this past week.
Started with 72, there’s only 10 people left
Started with 72, there’s only 10 people left
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,505
- 53,690
- Apr 4, 2016
- 19,104
- 11,122
I don’t get the spread game sometimes ….
The Vikings were -7, I took Chicago +7 — the final score was Min 29 Chi 22 (in regulation)
So did they not cover!?
The Vikings were -7, I took Chicago +7 — the final score was Min 29 Chi 22 (in regulation)
So did they not cover!?
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,505
- 53,690
I don’t get the spread game sometimes ….
The Vikings were -7, I took Chicago +7 — the final score was Min 29 Chi 22 (in regulation)
So did they not cover!?
its a push (tie/no result), technically...if you were betting money
jpzx
Supporter
- Feb 7, 2008
- 59,462
- 28,549
It would’ve been a push; as in you got your money back.
T0INE
formerly toine2983
- Dec 21, 2005
- 67,816
- 74,670
I don’t get the spread game sometimes ….
The Vikings were -7, I took Chicago +7 — the final score was Min 29 Chi 22 (in regulation)
So did they not cover!?
Picked the Bears too.
In order to win with your pick of the Bears they would've had to win outright since they're the underdogs or lose by 6 points or less.
That's why I was tight when the Vikings had the 2pt conversion late to up 7.
Would've been a push for whomever picked the Vikings too.
- Apr 4, 2016
- 19,104
- 11,122
Also never fails there’s a week I forgot picks and sure enough week 3 I forgot the early games. I’ve just started picking on Wednesday and going back to tweak it if I remember
