- 58,245
- 29,689
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Huh? Lamar could’ve had Jones contract yesterday if he wanted it. Nothing is apples to apples about their situations at all.
It’s fine that you don’t like Lamar, you think his best football is behind him, etc., but no point in misrepresenting facts. Lamar is seeking a fully guaranteed deal — not what Daniel Jones got. Which won’t even be Top 4 deals given out this offseason.
Huh? Right back at ya...
Jokes have already been made about DJs projected contract in light of Lamar not getting any love. I threw out DJ because he just got his and went on to mention others with actual guaranteed money in handComparing players just in a contractual/transactional sense was apples to apples when separating all else. I'm separating that piece to my opinion of his play.
And do me a favor hit "ctrl F" and point to where I said I don't like Lamar. On the contrary, I mentioned being on him going way back. Your emotions are in this, apparently.
Nothing I said was misleading in any way. My interpretation of apples to apples may not have been articulated well, I'll give you that. I'm simply responding directly to conjecture that was actually posted on this thread. Now knowing you a lawyer, I can see why you went through just 1 post with a fine tooth comb, but it's not resonating on the level you think it is.