- Dec 23, 2003
- 9,421
- 7,194
Three Cowboys and we couldn't recover!
FUUUUUUU!
FUUUUUUU!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you mean?
That was holding all the way. Cowboys missed a huge opportunity.
Three Cowboys and we couldn't recover!
FUUUUUUU!
Oh. Yeah. Sucks. Cowboys keeping GB in it 'til the end.I saw GB recover it I meant
Packers are pretty soft as always. Dallas is just tougher.
seattle fans, who do yall want to win today?
my barber is about as fairweather as they come, probably thinks it's called the 13th man, but he hails from seattle and "roots" for the 'hawks. i was telling him that it'd probably be a better match for yall if you play GB due to rodgers injury and his recent history against that secondary, not to mention, cowboys showed they could go into to c-link and win....but no, he insists that the cowboys are "soft" and prefers to play cowboys.
tell me this boy is out his damn mind.
What did I tell you guys about having the lead in the 2nd half being crucial in this game?
Demarco can basically kill the rest of the half now with a lead
Fox.
seattle fans, who do yall want to win today?
my barber is about as fairweather as they come, probably thinks it's called the 13th man, but he hails from seattle and "roots" for the 'hawks. i was telling him that it'd probably be a better match for yall if you play GB due to rodgers injury and his recent history against that secondary, not to mention, cowboys showed they could go into to c-link and win....but no, he insists that the cowboys are "soft" and prefers to play cowboys.
tell me this boy is out his damn mind.
Rodgers gored.