- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
News On Future Films Based on Comics/Paranormal/Sci-Fi
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by Bend_The_Knee,
- Start date
Ja's 2¢
formerly vcshoxj6
- Jun 20, 2001
- 6,720
- 2,615
I hope Shane Black aint directing again. :x
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
Directed by Mel Gibson?
With him also as the super villain?
Really though, I don't know why anybody wants another one of these as fans given how each sequel has been received.
Last edited:
Directed by Mel Gibson?
With him also as the super villain?
Really though, I don't know why anybody wants another one of these as fans given how each sequel has been received.
Half a bil prolly matters to somebody somewhere in an office overlooking nothing.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
I know why they're doing it. That's why I said as fans.Directed by Mel Gibson?
With him also as the super villain?
Really though, I don't know why anybody wants another one of these as fans given how each sequel has been received.
Half a bil prolly matters to somebody somewhere in an office overlooking nothing.
It'd actually be great if all the fans actively didn't come in droves to watch this one like the last and make it gross Cap1 #s. Not a flop but a huge drop off to let them know we're not gonna accept bull ****.
If not it'll just get worse and worse and worse.
- May 9, 2005
- 10,219
- 1,671
What the ****? They are getting a new Spiderman, already? Why?
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
This is confusing.
I thought Andrew was at least signed on for ASM 3 and 4 going in to 2018.
If 2016's S6 is a soft reboot with a new Spidey how does that mesh with the ASM sequels?
Either way I'd like to see me a Ben Reily Scsarlet Spider or Miles as Spidey if a new Spider-Man is forthcoming.
Like if they can keep soft rebooting and get rid of the ****** Green Goblin and the continuity of the first two ASM movies I'd be way more receptive to ASM crossing over in to any other movie franchise. From a story standpoint I also don't see why the MCU should go down to help SONY out with their Spiderverse.
- Sep 21, 2012
- 7,683
- 10,568
Wow did they really mess spiderman up that bad??
- Aug 23, 2004
- 14,106
- 6,328
and they're having Spidey team up with the S6? *yawn* It probably will be a decent movie but I thought they was going to do more of a Assault on Arkham type thing or the Superior Foes of Spider-Man type approach
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
Sony won't replace Garfield for the simple fact that he's still contracted and it would turn off audiences for a new spiderman so soon. What will happen is that the only connection to ASM that the MCU will have is Garfield. Along with the venom movie the sin 6 movie will be canceled as well and spiderman will appear in Marvel event films (either secret wars, infinity gauntlet or more likely civil war) as a seasoned spiderman who has had solo adventures including his bouts with the lizard and electro amongst others. Sony is not ready to give up on Garfield just yet and after he is done with these marvel event films then a reboot will happen in 2018. Book it.
- Aug 23, 2004
- 14,106
- 6,328
I hope that happens
- Dec 14, 2002
- 4,078
- 993
Spider-Man being recast? i thought Garfield was in contract and had the role for as long as he wanted??? Spidey fighting along S6??? WTF? i was hoping hed show up to foil their plan at the end.. i dont like this news, even if he is going to be apart of an MCU film..
no venom either????? WTF i thought we might see him finally done justice on the big screen!
no venom either????? WTF i thought we might see him finally done justice on the big screen!
Last edited:
- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,505
- 21,088
Tell Tobey to get back in the gym and bring him back.
- Dec 14, 2002
- 4,078
- 993
hell no
- Sep 1, 2009
- 9,921
- 4,296
Maybe the third time will be the charm for Spidey.
- Dec 14, 2002
- 4,078
- 993
itll be a charm cuz Marvel will have more input period. i just hate this rebooting business.
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
The whole spiderman teaming up with the sinister 6 tells me that film will end up being scrapped as well. It defeats the whole purpose. Garfield will stay spiderman and the MCU will bring him as having multiple solo adventures including what we've seen in ASM 1 and 2. It's the most logical and least cumbersome way to do it and allow audiences to have familiarized a face with spiderman. Sony has already set up the spiderman we know with the ASM series. A geek kid who's uncle dies. Gets bitten by a spider, creates web shooters, girlfriend gets killed because of a green goblin, all that great stuff. Why would Sony, Marvel or audiences want that rehashed again? Besides Garfield seems like he'll be great in an ensemble cast. He is spiderman.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
Like I said before to me it'd just be better if they're really bringing in another actor Spidey to just not make it Peter Parker.
Then hopefully we could get better Spider-Man movies.
Then hopefully we could get better Spider-Man movies.
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
Nobody in the MCU has a secret identity so spiderman wearing a mask at all times wouldn't fly and would also be the focus of what I feel marvel is trying to do with spiderman in the MCU which would be civil war. It goes perfect with everything that's building up right now considering what I think will happen due to the events of A2:AoU and the rumors of caps new team at the end which is the falling out of Steve and Tony. The superhuman registration act becomes active and tony tries to recruit spiderman on his side and persuade him to tell the world who he is (IRON SPIDER! Woooh!!!!) until he realizes how F'd up Tony is and switches sides to the secret avengers ran by cap. It also goes with what Avi Arad mentioned that spiderman will crossover when and if the story is about him and you know he's got his hands all over this. The plot is right in front of Marvel and Sony all they have to do is tie up loose ends for audiences which is no more than the obligatory "where was spiderman when the avengers were battling?" Which can easily be explained by spiderman being out of commission because of Gwen Stacy's death. He returns to being a superhero because of Gwen's speech and seeing his idols tony stark and captain America being heroic. They could even film a scene of him taking pics of the battle in New York or against Ultron for the bugle (JK Simmons cameo please!) and contemplating whether to help or not. Fits in perfectly!
Or if Sony were less stubborn earlier they could've allowed Marvel to come in and make Peter's parents shield agents
Which is still a possibility but shouldn't be added because audiences may get confused (which I wouldn't understand why) but it's right there for them. MAKE CIVIL WAR HAPPEN MARVEL! BUILD THANOS PROPERLY, DONT RUSH HIM.
- Aug 23, 2004
- 14,106
- 6,328
Nobody in the MCU that's been introduced yet has a secret identity. I think Daredevil, Iron Fist and some others to be introduced in the next couple of Phases might have secret identities.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
I don't know what you're talking about.
Nobody in the MCU has a secret identity so spiderman wearing a mask at all times wouldn't fly and would also be the focus of what I feel marvel is trying to do with spiderman in the MCU which would be civil war. It goes perfect with everything that's building up right now considering what I think will happen due to the events of A2:AoU and the rumors of caps new team at the end which is the falling out of Steve and Tony. The superhuman registration act becomes active and tony tries to recruit spiderman on his side and persuade him to tell the world who he is (IRON SPIDER! Woooh!!!!) until he realizes how F'd up Tony is and switches sides to the secret avengers ran by cap. It also goes with what Avi Arad mentioned that spiderman will crossover when and if the story is about him and you know he's got his hands all over this. The plot is right in front of Marvel and Sony all they have to do is tie up loose ends for audiences which is no more than the obligatory "where was spiderman when the avengers were battling?" Which can easily be explained by spiderman being out of commission because of Gwen Stacy's death. He returns to being a superhero because of Gwen's speech and seeing his idols tony stark and captain America being heroic. They could even film a scene of him taking pics of the battle in New York or against Ultron for the bugle (JK Simmons cameo please!) and contemplating whether to help or not. Fits in perfectly!
Or if Sony were less stubborn earlier they could've allowed Marvel to come in and make Peter's parents shield agents
Which is still a possibility but shouldn't be added because audiences may get confused (which I wouldn't understand why) but it's right there for them. MAKE CIVIL WAR HAPPEN MARVEL! BUILD THANOS PROPERLY, DONT RUSH HIM.
I didn't say anything about secret identities.
I just want better Spider-Man movies. I'm fine with it not being Peter Parker.
I really do not see any signs of Civil War coming up and I don't care to hear your crazy ideas of why it's happening. If the idea is that Marvel needs it's key characters to do Civil War then adding Spidey doesn't make things that more complete. Still key guys missing.
Basing CW all around Spidey having a secret ID would be terrible.
Last edited:
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
And I think they'll make it to the big screen to help fill the roster and add to the theme of the civil war. If Marvel pulls this off, which they will DC should just stop making films.
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
If Peter Parker isn't spiderman than who will be? Ben Riley? Miles Morales? People who casual audiences have no idea about? Peter Parker will always be spiderman in film. And as far as civil war, if you have spiderman, iron man and captain America you have 75% of civil war. You don't really need Reed Richards or Pym. All they did was create robot Thor and the other robotic heroes and I don't know if Marvel will add that part into the civil war. It'll make Tony look too much like a douche. And even still they can just have stark industries fill in the role of for making the robot heroes
- Aug 23, 2004
- 14,106
- 6,328
