- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,813
- 62,676
Sh*t, Reynolds > Knoxville.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sam rockwell > Johnny
you can get away with **** like that as long as it's not gorey.. I remember reading that the MPAA classifies things like that "suggestive violence" (because they didn't actually show him slicing the head) and for whatever reason they seem to be cool with that.Damn, that's PG-13? It looked very Kick-***-esque to be PG-13 with the decapitation and all.
Simple. Lose a ton Of revenue on the kid sales.
Idk why Hollywood is so scared of R-rated movies nowadays..
a R Rated film from the late 80s is basically a PG-13 film today..
these ratings don't really means ****.. they've objective as **** because the MPAA as a whole is stupid.
Deadpool is too much for me in anything other than a supporting role.
[COLOR=#red]Facially:
vs.
same cheeks, wrinkles, nose, brow and smile.
body:
vs.
Body type is the same. Knoxville puts on 7 lbs of muscle and it's the same.
He also has the same sarcasm and wits about him to handle whatever is in the script. I've enjoyed him in Last Stand, Movie 43, and Lords of Dogtown. In conclusion, I would of liked to see RR do it since it's been his baby but it really does seem people don't want to touch that guy. Not trying to persuade anyone, it's all a what if anyway, just giving you what I think is all.[/COLOR]