- 53,477
- 21,057
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
Just leave him in Hulk form the whole time like the Avengers cartoon and you won't even need to have an actor play Banner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The continuous regurgitated idea that Edward Norton could not work with an ensemble cast is complete bull ****. Just look at his filmography.
They'd be better off saying it was money and/or he specifically couldn't work with Whedon due to the bit role he would've ended up playing or something along those lines.
Need inks for all of this info...Thinking about how interesting Blade 2 could have been if Morbius was the villain like the original plan. Also was reading about the original screenplay for Trinity and the studio really blew it. It was set a few decades after the second one with the vampires ruling the human population. It was deemed too dark.
I disagree with most of this, especially the second sentence.The continuous regurgitated idea that Edward Norton could not work with an ensemble cast is complete bull ****. Just look at his filmography.
They'd be better off saying it was money and/or he specifically couldn't work with Whedon due to the bit role he would've ended up playing or something along those lines.
That's the thing. Norton's acting is just TOO good/serious for it to work in something like the Avengers. TDH(200 was just too serious and lacked any charm most of the other Marvel movies usually have. Norton was a d1ck, Blonsky was a d1ck, General Ross was (accurately) a d1ick, didn't care much for Liv Tyler. Don't get me wrong, I loved the movie for what it was but without getting into a deeper argument over spilled milk, I'm pretty glad whatever happened, happened.
I disagree with most of this, especially the second sentence.
So you just felt like telling me that? @ "too good/serious" as well. It's kinda like you're speaking from a stance of seeing one movie and not his body of work to believe what you typed.I disagree with most of this, especially the second sentence.
Of course you wouldn't which is why I replied to you in the first place. I'm fine with agreeing to disagree as there's no point talking about someone who's already been re-casted.
The other dude Scott something was the thief not that Eric wouldn't but he started off as a shield agent that just took some Ant Man equipment Shield took from Pym.Wow that's cool. I was kinda thinking before the announcement that if Pym was in A2 he'd create Ultron and then die in the end and not Coulson die but really die.Plus I'm not even sure it's been confirmed that the Ant Man in the Ant Man movie is going to be Hank Pym. Since in the comics there's been 3 different guys to take up the name.
I believe Wright have been saying Hank Pym and then Scott Lang becomes the AntMan in the end. I remember him talking about the two teaming up as well.
Wright's way is cool too and probably keeps Pym around to be Giant Man or Yellow Jacket or Goliath l
Thought they would say that Pym was a scientist back during WW2 and built the tech then. He dies or goes missing, it's lost and Eric O'Grady finds it and decides to be a thief blah blah blah becomes a good guy. I can see Wright doing that.
If Eric O'Grady was the Ant Man I'd see this over and over. Especially if they got the action and raunchy comedy right.
So you just felt like telling me that? @ "too good/serious" as well. It's kinda like you're speaking from a stance of seeing one movie and not his body of work to believe what you typed.
It's a good thing I didn't waste my time then.
ryan reynolds sucks. I hate when he tries to be funny in action movies because he's not funny. He's tolerable in more serious roles and rom-coms.
THE AVENGERS Are No Match For GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY, Promises Cast Members
Preconceived notions about Guardians of the Galaxy would consider the interstellar superhero team, 'Earth's mightiest heroes... in space,' but cast members of the upcoming adaptation say otherwise. "We're different than the Avengers," insists Zoe Saldana. "The Guardians have much 'bigger' powers. We could totally kick Thor and Captain America's ***." Dave Bautista agrees chiming in, "Drax could definitely beat up Hulk and Thor." Seemingly in an effort to differentiate his warrior character and the Hulk, Bautista adds, "Drax is an interesting creature. He's full of rage and he's full of honor. But the best thing about Drax is he's hysterical, without really meaning to be."
"It's the 'Anti-Hero Hero Movie," said Zoe Saldana. "These are thieves, rebels, assassins who come together to fight something actually much worse than them. And there's actually a lot of comedy — the levity will be abundant," she adds. Meanwhile, Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn shared a bit of random info about Benicio del Toro, who's set to play The Collector. "During our first meeting, Benicio and I were discussing collecting stuff," said Gunn. "And suddenly he got very serious and turned to me and said, 'I was the first kid in my 'hood to have an alligator.'" Speaking of the Collector, whose presence is said to span multiple films, and the aforementioned bit about the Guardians duking it out with The Avengers, it's heavily implied the two superhero teams will eventually cross paths at the threat of Thanos.
I like what I am seeing from GotG but anyone else skeptical it will be that successful? I admit I am one of the few who never thought this project would be made because it'll be very cgi-heavy and that means it'll cost a lot. I can see it being a perfectly good film but like Pacific Rim (also very cgi-heavy and expensive because of it), it might not have the same appeal especially since these heroes are still obscure to most.
Marvel will have to crank out the GotG in the Avengers and Spiderman cartoons to further familiarize the audience to them but I can just see this being mediocre in the box office and maybe not a flop but disappointing to say the least? Captain America only made $370mil, that is a big success with the $140mil budget but GotG will likely cost more and I am not sure it'll reach that number if it came out today. I don't know, I just have that feeling. Anyone with me on that?
I don't really think GotG is essential with Thanos on board, I think Marvel felt that they need to delay his arrival and a GotG movie not only expands their universe and introduce new heroes to the public, but it also delays Thanos' bout with the Avengers w/o making it seem like Marvel just forgot about him. It keeps the interest high.