NBC employee claims Bill Cosby paid off women, invited young models to dressing room.

Or he compared court cost vs what she was asking and settled.

Just saying..
 
man. they should put him with the other seals at the zoo
 
Last edited:
So now the idea is Bill Cosby didn't rape a woman because there's no way a black man can get away with raping a white woman

It's great to know how highly y'all think of your brothers
laugh.gif
I don't throw a man under the bus until we get pass the allegations...and I of course I think highly of my "brother" he's done more for the black community than any of these so-called entertainers out today; more so in the realm of education than anything else. 

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/05/-this-is-how-we-lost-to-the-white-man/306774/
 
Last edited:
Also, you act as if people cant be bought nowadays.

Not saying thats what happened, but its not out of the realm of possibility.
but you still didnt answer the question... why/how would 40+ women out the blue with no way of communicating, who dont know each other nor that you had sex with them all have the same accounts as far as you drugging and raping them? 

And how would the buying process go.... they would what find/guess every women he has met, track them down and coerce them into filing reports of rape, and then say what... ok well decades from now this thing called social media will come out to which we will then need you to come out at a undetermined date after the turn of the century......and post it on twitter.... dont worry youll know what that means when the time comes....

lol yall up here on some roswell/area 51 underground mk ultra elaborate plot all to destroy a tv dads public image....

Hell this dude aint mlk, malcom x,jfk lol.....
 
lol MK Ultra Bill Cosby.




I wonder if Hannible Buress will ever say something about this story on Eric Andre show
 
And this monster has the audacity to be on stage and joke about the allegations vs being a man and defending his name! And yall defending this punk??

He feels all powerful and above the law cause he's a rich arrogant p.o.s , take down this clown and his "legacy" he deserves to get his ish pushed in and his salad tossed in the pen.
 
I dont BELIEVE he did. I really don't know.

The last thing I would do is base my opinion on something so serious based of he say she say.

Truthfully, I dont care. My biggest problem with this whole thread is people just believing it because they seen on the internet or saw it on TV.

That just scary. NTers yell sheep at the drop of a hat, but will do some sheep **** sooo fast. Its like some of yall have absolutely no control of your mind whatsoever.

This "sheep" argument is so child-like and simplistic.

We were given the same information from the same sources as you. The difference being that we weighed it out and came to a conclusion while you disregarded it in favor of playing the fence to assert some sort of moral superiority.

Then you throw out the thinly veiled insults as if being ambiguous is better than forming an actual opinion.

:rolleyes
 
Accusations are not opinions.

Lol its only and insult if you felt insulted.
 
Last edited:
This "sheep" argument is so child-like and simplistic.

We were given the same information from the same sources as you. The difference being that we weighed it out and came to a conclusion while you disregarded it in favor of playing the fence to assert some sort of moral superiority.

Then you throw out the thinly veiled insults as if being ambiguous is better than forming an actual opinion.

:rolleyes


BINGO. you acting like people haven't been convicted for serious crimes with less evidence than all of these witnesses. If he was on trial dude would be guilty on all charges lol
 
This "sheep" argument is so child-like and simplistic.

We were given the same information from the same sources as you. The difference being that we weighed it out and came to a conclusion while you disregarded it in favor of playing the fence to assert some sort of moral superiority.

Then you throw out the thinly veiled insults as if being ambiguous is better than forming an actual opinion.

:rolleyes


BINGO. you acting like people haven't been convicted for serious crimes with less evidence than all of these witnesses. If he was on trial dude would be guilty on all charges lol

I believe you're confusing witnesses with accusers.
 
So let me ask, if he's a rapist shouldn't he be in jail?

If someone raped you or someone you knew, wouldn't you want to get that person off the street?

Why would said woman sue versus press criminal charges?
 
If he's guilty then yeah he should definitely be in jail.

If you basing his innocence on the mindset of women who are fearful shamed etc at the time of the event then I would have to assume you might not appreciate how one might feel in those situations.

A year later, Constand, a Canadian, reported her allegation to police in Ontario. After investigating, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce L. Castor Jr. decided not to file criminal charges, saying the case against Cosby was weak.

Constand sued Cosby one month later, in March 2005. She sought an unspecified amount of money on allegations of sexual assault and of defamation stemming from statements that Cosby and his agents made about her to news outlets.
 
If the criminal case was weak, he could have won that lawsuit.
 
So let me ask, if he's a rapist shouldn't he be in jail?

If someone raped you or someone you knew, wouldn't you want to get that person off the street?

Why would said woman sue versus press criminal charges?
that could be said about many of cases.... ala ppl who sue for murders/death etc..... 

Plus many dont want to especially at that because of the public shame and vehemently hate etc... many would have towards you for doing so... 

Times have changed.... it was time when women DIDNT want to be seen as a *** or be polarized acknowledged because of sexual acts....

Back then aint like you could have a public perception as being a ***, then companies would come out and offer you millions... to do like a playboy type cover, or a porno, or a reality tv show, or a upfront money guaranteed tell all book deal... and aint like women back then were proud to do it and looked forward/hoping for it.

I mean i could def see the point if this was all just happening now, and it was someone like chris brown, or trey songz etc... and it was a bunch of 20 y/o chicks all saying this... 

I totally could see a whole money grab, trying to get fame/notoriety efame and what not. 

But what would lets say a women late 20's early 30's in the 80's gain/benefit from going to trial to which due to money/power/poor representation would lose... and be seen as the ***** who tried to besmirch "tvs good guy dad" ...So most just to the L and moved on... Hell like someone posted earlier most women who are raped either dont file or recant statements even if the evidence shows/states that infact they were raped. 
 
So let me ask, if he's a rapist shouldn't he be in jail?


If someone raped you or someone you knew, wouldn't you want to get that person off the street?


Why would said woman sue versus press criminal charges?
that could be said about many of cases.... ala ppl who sue for murders/death etc..... 

Plus many dont want to especially at that because of the public shame and vehemently hate etc... many would have towards you for doing so... 

Times have changed.... it was time when women DIDNT want to be seen as a *** or be polarized acknowledged because of sexual acts....

Back then aint like you could have a public perception as being a ***, then companies would come out and offer you millions... to do like a playboy type cover, or a porno, or a reality tv show, or a upfront money guaranteed tell all book deal... and aint like women back then were proud to do it and looked forward/hoping for it.

I mean i could def see the point if this was all just happening now, and it was someone like chris brown, or trey songz etc... and it was a bunch of 20 y/o chicks all saying this... 

I totally could see a whole money grab, trying to get fame/notoriety efame and what not. 

But what would lets say a women late 20's early 30's in the 80's gain/benefit from going to trial to which due to money/power/poor representation would lose... and be seen as the ***** who tried to besmirch "tvs good guy dad" ...So most just to the L and moved on... Hell like someone posted earlier most women who are raped either dont file or recant statements even if the evidence shows/states that infact they were raped. 

I understand what your saying, but the lawsuit happened in 2004, ****, and last time I checked money been money since money been money.

My thing is you can base his guilt off the fact he settled out of court.

It may have been more cost efficient to just go ahead and settle, which is the plan for most lawyers.
 
ya phyllis that he is really innocent? it doesnt matter if he did it once or fiddy times
 
I understand what your saying, but the lawsuit happened in 2004, ****, and last time I checked money been money since money been money.

My thing is you can base his guilt off the fact he settled out of court.

It may have been more cost efficient to just go ahead and settle, which is the plan for most lawyers.
im saying the majority of the women who are like 40/50 now who are coming out and saying stuff and just took hush money back in the day.... At that time pill bill was the man... and alot of these women were aspiring actresses/entertainers etc.... 

A allegation towards arguably the biggest most polarized man on tv would blackball you from hollywood permanently. Plus not to mention 9/10 times if the case went to trial you would lose. Hell in those days rape was a joke, and more often then not in those times a women claiming rape was seen as a lose women who regrets what she did...

Hell back then there wasnt even rape/abuse if you was married..so that just goes to speak on how society and how the law viewed rape. Like i said before lack of public acknowledgement and awareness, lack of media outlets, social media... it was an entirely different time. Then like i said equate that with who he was and the power influence he had and the backing he had... it wouldve been like david and goliath.

I mean its not like these allegations are recent they just keep popping up every 5 yrs or so. Difference is now society has changed, media outlets are wide spread...and then infusion and integration of social media and technology. 

I mean lets take this situation and put it into everyday context/situations... If a person was accused by several ppl to be a thief or known to stiff ppl out on the rent....would you say oh well regardless of their rent history and several separate ppl attesting to it. You havent served time so sure your good move on in.

Or how about a person who bounced around job to job due to poor work performance or better yet stealing, but no charges were filed, would you hire them? How about a girl who everywhere you turned there was someone telling you she a ho and she get down....would you say well i will look past that and still wanna be with you. 
 
Dude saying if you were raped wouldn't you want the person to go to jail

If you weren't a rapist wouldn't you say so?

Hypotheticals for days :lol
 
Back
Top Bottom