- 88
- 38
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
i hope ohio does this as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't believe his proposal legislates what you can do with it... Mainly just what can come out of it.
No, what they need to do is require birth control for women on welfare. Want your check? Get a booster shot first.
So you want to legislate what I can or can not do with my vagina?
No sir.
It'd be unconstitutional. Would never happen.
What exactly makes it unconstitutional?
The best unnecessary child deterrent is education and social mobility. Especially for impoverished women.
I don't believe his proposal legislates what you can do with it... Mainly just what can come out of it.
No, what they need to do is require birth control for women on welfare. Want your check? Get a booster shot first.
So you want to legislate what I can or can not do with my vagina?
No sir.
It'd be unconstitutional. Would never happen.
What exactly makes it unconstitutional?
kind of off-base but i've noticed a trend in "tree states" to curb DUI by training cops to be "experts" on determining if someone is high on weed...
...which is ridiculous....
the best quick way to test someone for weed is a blood test - therefore i'm sure, in the future, it will be pushed to give cops the legal right to draw blood from a driver right there on the side of the road just like they can administer a breathalyzer for alcohol...
a cop taking a blood sample would be a clear violation of the 4th amendment (at this time)
LAPD has been using saliva oral swab kits on the spot if they suspect you're under the influence. They also call for a drug recognition officer to test your impairment.
The best unnecessary child deterrent is education and social mobility. Especially for impoverished women.
Explain the social mobility aspect ?
What exactly makes it unconstitutional?
am guessing he means it violates the 4th amendment:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The money set aside for welfare is a smalllll portion of the budget. We live in a society where we blame the poor for everything . Michigan will just waste money like Florida with this stupid policy. You don't want people on welfare abusing drugs why not focus on how drugs get into impoverished neighborhoods???? I guess it's better to skip the root causes of the drug issue and just punish the poor.The poor aren't the only ones who get state support tho
He can't. It's an idealistic catch phrase.
Wait correct me if I'm wrong, but you're saying you need education to understand that having 10 kids you cannot take care of isn't wise? Or am I reading this wrong?
I know there is a definite correlation between socioeconomic status and how many children people have. Educated people are moving more toward a trend of not having children or having less children, while the woman from the projects on welfare is having 6 or 7. I suspect many of these women use their children either as chips to get what they want whether it be govt assistance or child support. If we put an end to policies that promote these benefits we will see a drop in the birth rate.
Florida passed the measure in 2011, and the case was being closely watched by several other states, including Georgia, which passed similar legislation in 2013 but found it dogged by legal challenges. State data in Florida also showed that the measure produced few results. Only 108 out of 4,086 people tested — 2.6 percent — were found to have been using narcotics. State records showed that the requirement cost more money to carry out than it saved.
New U.S. fertility data suggest that having a higher education isn’t associated with having a big family: Women who are college graduates are likely to have fewer children — if they have them at all — than their less-educated sisters, the Census Bureau said Monday.
While the catch phrase part may be true, I will explain what I mean.
Education can be and is used as a form of social segregation
It is also true that the uneducated classes have more children.
Less of their time is spent pursuing things like demanding degrees and fields because their economic situation makes them feel as if to that would be going outside of their box.
For the poor in parts of the world where education is a luxury, they have nothing to hold off on having kids for. They feel as if their destiny is only gonna go so far so why bother. It's the people lucky enough to get good education that get to sit and ponder what they want to be when they grow up. For the poor, they have to grow up quickly without contemplation.
Typical "blame the system" argument. Education starts and ends at home. The government can (and will) only do so much. Parents need to take an active role in their kid's (or kids') education. Without that, there is no hope. We're so far gone, that what you say about education and climbing the socio-economic ladder is just not a reality. We'd have to start over at this point, and we can't.
The Sun analyzed federal education data on school expenditures and high school graduation rates and found the majority of states see a correlation between high education spending and high student performance.
Of the top half of states that spend the most on schools, 15 states — or 60 percent — are also among the top half of states with the highest graduation rates.
The following states spend the most on schools and have among the highest graduation rates: Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia ( ), Wisconsin and Wyoming.
Two states in particular, Vermont and New Hampshire, are among the top 10 states in both per-pupil spending and the high school graduation rate.
Of the bottom half of states that spend the least on education, 14 states — or 56 percent — are also among the bottom half of states with the lowest graduation rates.
The following states spend the least on schools and have among the lowest graduation rates nationally: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Indiana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah and Washington.
Two states in particular, Alabama and Nevada, are among the bottom 10 states nationally in both per-pupil spending and high school graduation rate.