- 534
- 39
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
they aight but they WAYYY better then them ugly *** croc skin un's!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by WallyHopp
subtle color placement is key. and has been key since the beginning. Tinker knew and exploited it to its finest in the original releases. ive said it in other threads but you truly cant steer too far away from the og c/w's or you may get some questionable "crap".Originally Posted by L7OSER
IMO these are great. Materials bein cheap is expected from Nike. I wont be wearing these shoes to run track in (and neither will 90% of u) so thats not a big deal. Slap sum force fields in to stop the creasing and im good. I dont get y yall complain so much. These r not the Infrareds so y whine about no grey mudguard n more of an "infrared" color? And the Laser Blues didnt have a grey mudguard but those r grail status to most people on here. If i put "JD exclusive AM90" as the title to this thread then every1 would be like "y does Euro get all the nice colorways"
laser blues were an original 1990 colorway retroed for the first time via a Jd sports exclusive. THATS why its a grail.. that shoe features some subtle color placement. Close to the infrared model but slightly different.. Just look at soleaddicts photoshop and thats your ideal max orange am90 retro c/w:
vs. OG c/w retro:
now imagine the laser blue c/w in a color scheme that we see from this max orange release.. we would get:
but wait Nike has already done their rendition of their "close enough is good enough" camp:
Subtle changes can work but often times they do not.
Close but still ultimately wrong. one to two small miscues can have sometype effects
Originally Posted by SylvesterMcGrizzly
that orange looks damn near red...