- 281
- 19
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
I only have one NT staff member *cough* Manglor *cough* on my list of references, but now it looks like I'll have to take him off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No actually I did , but dudes was saying $125 isnt a good price for the Cool Greys that Manglor posted , because they definitely are .Originally Posted by Mangudai954
Originally Posted by Chi ILL
$125 is actually a good price if the kicks were in the condition he provided in the first pics . That definitely would have been a steal .
They go for $300+ DS ... chill y'all .
You didnt read everything did you
Originally Posted by s dubl
peep Manglor in the car...you're the man Crank
couldnt have said it better.Originally Posted by superblyTRIFE
How are you gonna make a thread about YOU getting scammed and the seller is punking YOU into changing the title of said thread in order to get a refund?
FAIL.
Seriously, both of you dudes need to step your transaction game up. Buyer needs to be more thorough with the investigations into what he's getting. And Manglor needs to take pics that accurately SHOW what is wrong with the shoes. Yeah, yeah, yeah--you described it. But c'mon gee--you aint' fooling anyone with the angles you positioned those joints in, except the fool who bought them.
Originally Posted by j671
shouldve spoken to you first before he tried to air you out....
They go for $300+ DS
damn..didn't know that..
I gave my pair away a couple of years ago as a wedding gift
FixedOriginally Posted by Manglor
That gif was AWESOME.
Cliffnotes...
I worked the angles to make my shoes look as best as possible, dude was unhappy with what actually came in. Dude wanted a refund or partial refund.
I said sure thing if he apologized and changed the title of the thread.
He apologized and changed the title of the thread and i gave him what he wanted.
Now i need someone to turn that GIF into an avatar for me...
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by tree4twenty
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
Dirtylicious wrote:
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
Why would the OP think a buy/sell mod would pull a fast one on him though? Basically OP's mistake was trusting NT staff. Some one who should be helpingmake things better who SHOULD be trust worthy and honest. Yet the fault lies only on OP's shoulders. Ok dirty your right it has nothing to do with yourfellow staff being shady
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by tree4twenty
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
what fast one?.. the shoes were described as used and having ink stains
yet, you can't see any stains in the pics...so where do you think they would be?.
tree4twenty wrote:
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
True.
If seller declines more pics, then something is up and OP isnt too bright.
At the same time, denying pics cause you know that the buyer wont buy them just to make the sale is shady. (IF he denied the pics)
Honestly, I dont see OP asking for more pics based on the fact that one of the pics showed a stain, so he figures Manglor isnt hiding anything.
Well, Manglor WAS hiding things and that is just wrong. Flaws in anything you are buying selling sways the buy/sell price drastically and hiding half of the flaws ON PURPOSE for extra money is being dishonest.
If he said they had a stain in the description and one of his pics showed a stain, I wouldnt ask for more pics either....
In the end, Manglor was shady and OP should have gone about it different.
The soles coming off is another story....
And LOL @ Manglor saying the stains should come out easily. Ink is far from easy to get out....
Exactly. Dirty maybe you don't really go over to buy/sell much but when there is a certain flaw in your description you are suppose to have pics of thatflaw. If a mod who should obviously know how to make a proper listing states that there is minor stains, and puts up those pics like Manglor did then I wouldthink it's that little bit that's in those pics. Him having these pics and having that description is deceiving regardless of if OP asked for more picsor not. If you have those kinda pics it's to make it seem as if those stains are so minor that you can't really see them. In that pic the shoes areobviously used but it says nothing about the back material coming off. I don't know about I S S cause I have never used that site but on the other sites Ifrequent and have bought shoes from the mods are nothing like this and conduct them selves and handle business in a proper way. So I see why dude would put histrust into the mod regardless of him knowing him or not because I personally would have done the same seeing as how every mod I have ever encountered has beena perfect transaction. Especially with NT being as strict as it is I would expect the mods on here to meet to the standards of some of the lesser sites. But Iguess I was wrong.
Originally Posted by Wade187
tree4twenty wrote:
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
Originally Posted by Wade187
tree4twenty wrote:
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
Originally Posted by JosephSKC
Well put. I really can't believe Dirty is siding with Manglor on this one.Kinda makes you wonder....