darthska
Staff member
- 46,571
- 30,913
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
Looking at the entire Question/Answer line, I honestly don't know how Iverson can be happy.
I mean, he has his own line and can call that his own legacy, but it's a legacy of overall crap with a couple (maybe a few) nice shoes in there.
His Nike sig line would have evolved into something special, because he's marketable and he's a flashy guard. I think they would have used HIS shoe tointroduce new technologies, and we basically would have went from the hottest sneakers being Jordans and then transitioning to Penny's kicks and thentransitioning to Iverson's kicks (once Penny started to fall off) and then LeBron would have came through.
But I'm no psychic and that's all just speculation.
But I find it hard to believe that Nike would have failed at being more innovative and tastefully bold than Reebok has been for Bubba Chuck.
I mean, he has his own line and can call that his own legacy, but it's a legacy of overall crap with a couple (maybe a few) nice shoes in there.
His Nike sig line would have evolved into something special, because he's marketable and he's a flashy guard. I think they would have used HIS shoe tointroduce new technologies, and we basically would have went from the hottest sneakers being Jordans and then transitioning to Penny's kicks and thentransitioning to Iverson's kicks (once Penny started to fall off) and then LeBron would have came through.
But I'm no psychic and that's all just speculation.
But I find it hard to believe that Nike would have failed at being more innovative and tastefully bold than Reebok has been for Bubba Chuck.