- 3,130
- 10
- Joined
- May 21, 2005
You mean you disagree with my opinion? But, at least you are not just basing it off just hearsay, you did your research and came to your soundjudgment.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
Although I disagree with your point of view, I agree the case doesn't seem as cut and dried as alot of media outlets are making it seem.
Libyan government, IMO, was heavily involved.
From what I have read, that the parts used to make the bombs and the trigger mechanisms were made in the Soviet Union. In my opinion,it seems that theevidence the US and the UK withheld is that it was pointed to the USSR. However, due to the dynamics and change of atmosphere and the softening under thedetente and Gorbachev's reforms, they pointed the finger to Libya. If the Libyan government was heavily involved or mainly responsible, it was probably anoperation from their intelligence agencies and the higher ups, and this man was just used as a scapegoat.
The trial was completely unfair, the intelligence agencies withheld so much evidence. No public inquiry into the case either. There was no hard-proof andcompelling evidence, all circumstantial. No proof he did it, at all.