TheGodFresco
formerly gsdoubleu
- 24,478
- 2,308
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
Coaching staff looking strong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
True but IMO giving up Klay and Barnes in that deal is way too much to give up.
I don't think FO is that dumb to do the deal without a sign and trade.Why would the Warriors have to break the bank for a player on the last year of his deal. TWolves are askin for too much it could cost them when he leaves after season and they get nothing.
Well it wouldnt be a sign and trade, but just an extension in place......
But I honestly think we would do the trade regardless. Lets say it is just Lee and Klay for Love with no extension for Love in place. As already noted, Klay wants a max deal and is up after next season. Love wants a max deal and is up after next season. So whats the difference if we wouldnt have Love locked up longterm? We dont have Klay locked up longterm.
There is one huge difference though........gettin to dump David Lee. I would make the trade without an extension in place for Love for this reason alone.
Warriors would be stupid to agree to a Love trade unless they had an extension in place. Love has said he would like to play with Steph Curry in the past.But wouldn't Klay be a restricted free agent? meaning it would be up to management if they want to keep him or not if he gets offered a max deal. While Love on the other hand can simply just walk away if he doesn't sign an extenstion.
if they have to move Lee and Thompson this will NOT be worth it. only clay then ya,
I think technically Love can't sign an extension until after the 3rd year of his current contract. Not to sure on thisWarriors would be stupid to agree to a Love trade unless they had an extension in place. Love has said he would like to play with Steph Curry in the past.But wouldn't Klay be a restricted free agent? meaning it would be up to management if they want to keep him or not if he gets offered a max deal. While Love on the other hand can simply just walk away if he doesn't sign an extenstion.
I'm gonna get a kick out of your explanation.if they have to move Lee and Thompson this will NOT be worth it. only clay then ya,
if they have to move Lee and Thompson this will NOT be worth it. only clay then ya,
True but IMO giving up Klay and Barnes in that deal is way too much to give up.
I'd rather trade for the Season S2/Episode 2 Zoe Barnes than Harrison Barnes at this point.
This week will be interesting... *cues MJ popcorn gif
My prediction: Klay will NOT be traded.
- Bob Myers extends the contract of Cory Matthews this Fall, trades D.Lee for an expiring contract (i.e Chandler), and ships Barnes for a pick. Which all leads to more cap space.
The Result: Warriors sign Love during FA, while retaining Klay Thompson.
#Hopeful
“@BaxterHolmes: League source says that, as of now, the GSW-Minnesota deal for Kevin Love is dead.”
“@BaxterHolmes: League source says that, as of now, the GSW-Minnesota deal for Kevin Love is dead.”
i don't like life right now.
Golden State Warriors will almost certainly be renamed San Francisco Warriors (new logos also use black). pic.twitter.com/3HFQUoVlUW
— RealGM (@RealGM) June 23, 2014
Golden State Warriors will almost certainly be renamed San Francisco Warriors (new logos also use black). pic.twitter.com/3HFQUoVlUW
— RealGM (@RealGM) June 23, 2014
I think someone mentioned here renaming the team to the Bay Area Warriors which I liked a lot. Mainly because of the possibility that we could simply get "The Bay" on our Jerseys