- Jul 6, 2004
- 3,740
- 216
I'm rockin with D'lo. He'll be our starting PG for a decade
|| LocK Dis Up ||
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
- Status
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Jan 4, 2012
- 11,410
- 12,654
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,364
- 40,822
That's my PG
- Feb 17, 2007
- 21,784
- 2,957
Lil B removed the curse per Twitter. D'Angelo reached out to him directly with a dap.
Last edited:
- Mar 24, 2001
- 44,833
- 66,536
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,984
- 31,608
spicflair
Banned
- Jan 28, 2016
- 19
- 17
D-Lo been putting in work this offseason so far 
- May 7, 2015
- 306
- 60
Clown *** rapper. What the hell was he wearing during sportsnation?? Game blouses
Last edited:
- Apr 24, 2006
- 18,754
- 13,107
Unless he's traded this summer, which is not unlikely
- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,549
- 13,052
It's pretty unlikely.
- Apr 24, 2006
- 18,754
- 13,107
No ones untouchable
If PG or Boogie become available and they want Dlo in a package, it'll happen
If PG or Boogie become available and they want Dlo in a package, it'll happen
- May 9, 2005
- 10,219
- 1,671
I doubt that
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,006
- 9,942
this.
- May 17, 2007
- 25,132
- 23,960
Teams don't just trade players like Boogie or George just cuz. Their fans would riot. The only stars who might get traded this offseason are Butler+Love & the lakers aren't gunna trade Dlo for Butler or Love lol.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,811
- 129,126
If the Kings are out of the playoff race by January, I can see them trading Boogie.
- Sep 15, 2014
- 1,545
- 505
They're not making the playoffs and only way boogie is getting traded is if he demands it and it will not be for dlo...they're gonna want 1st round picks or an all star
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,811
- 129,126
They'll see the writing on the wall soon. Better off trading him soon while they have the leverage.
- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,549
- 13,052
Wouldn't trade Russell for Cousins especially mid season.
For a few reasons
1. It'll take way more than Russell for Boogie. Likely Russell & Ingram. Or Russell, Randle & Clarkson which could work because Clarkson will get more money.
Lou Will probably has to be thrown in with Russ & Ingram to make salary work.
And Boogie just doesn't have that kind of worth in the NBA. Very few do.
2. Trading mid season means you don't capitalize on any potential FA help Boogie would bring for 2017. You have to wait until 2017, when presumably you've spent a good chunk of your cap already.
Although I'm dubious of him having a significant amount of pull over the young guys. More? Yes. Significantly more? No.
For a few reasons
1. It'll take way more than Russell for Boogie. Likely Russell & Ingram. Or Russell, Randle & Clarkson which could work because Clarkson will get more money.
Lou Will probably has to be thrown in with Russ & Ingram to make salary work.
And Boogie just doesn't have that kind of worth in the NBA. Very few do.
2. Trading mid season means you don't capitalize on any potential FA help Boogie would bring for 2017. You have to wait until 2017, when presumably you've spent a good chunk of your cap already.
Although I'm dubious of him having a significant amount of pull over the young guys. More? Yes. Significantly more? No.
Last edited:
- Jan 4, 2012
- 11,410
- 12,654
I still don't understand why we would trade our future away for a guy whose team has only won 25 games once 
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,364
- 40,822
1. we sign an established player and want to make a push to make us a contender
2 the FO panis, and by FO i mean Jim wants to save his ***
draft ingram, develop the young talent and que sera, sera
- Jan 4, 2012
- 11,410
- 12,654
What makes you so certain players would even want to deal with cousins as a teammate?
And what makes your certain a combination of DLo + randle and/or Clarkson aren't already worth more than cousins.
I like cousins, but I don't buy that he's worth the headache to sign, let alone trade potential stars for him...
I bet Cleveland wishes they never traded for love right about now
Last edited:
- Status
