- 44,801
- 66,511
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2001
His offense is the same as Byron's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Anything is better than Byron if Brooks sucks so be it but let the kids grow he'll do that
get rid of dlo
Also you do know that, that has almost a 0% chance of happening. Even if they got Westbrook.
They are not going to get rid of D'Angelo.... Hell why would they?
This same nonsense about young PGs, granted Russell will be far better than Ramon Sessions will ever be, and is actually better than Sessions has ever been already is how we ended up trading a bunch of picks for Steve Nash
Brooks also has a "great track record" with young players. Same guy that was giving perk and fisher minutes over Adams, Reggie, Morrow, lamb etc. Only played young players when injuries forced his hand.
Byron also has a "great track record" with young players. Brooks is the same guy that was giving perk and fisher minutes over Adams, Reggie, Morrow, lamb etc. Only played young players when injuries forced his hand. He's not so different from pre Cleveland Byron honestly
westbrook for dlo is a no brainer. literally, a no brainer.
E this is kinda like your fascination with hibbert last year. Brooks just aint it man.
I'll concede that I was slightly off on my points. Bottom line is that Scott Brooks is cheeks tho. Someone like @DatZNasty would be better suited to come in here and expound on it.
Anything is better than Byron at this point.
I understand that but what I'm saying is would you rather have Byron out or be stuck with him?And that's the problem.
KD and russ also had more success as a coach than Byron ever did.
Scott also had more success as a coach than Byron ever did.