- 43
- 11
Legit or not guys?!?
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by jcraig610,
- Start date
- 5,692
- 1,762
Are these GS size?
- 43
- 11
No, size 12
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- 7,981
- 4,083
Need better pics because the ones you took are blurry or awkward angled. They look fake though from what I see. The arch that's supposed to be on the back sole and midsole looks almost non existent, the 23s look off and collars look kinda fat. Also the toe caps look wide almost like if they OGs but they're not OGs.
- 4,203
- 1,418
fake
- 43
- 11
Details my man?
- 5,692
- 1,762
Super fake. The whole shape is just off.
- 43
- 11
Yo 88, I was jus checking on that post of the Concorde with the jumpman going in opposite direction n u replied that they were real, that is probably the easiest way to tell of fake or not, so sorry if I think ur credibility is off my man!
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- 7,981
- 4,083
Seems like you don't know 11s....
If you think reverse jumpmans are a way to tell real vs fake then you need to do some research. Reverse jumpmans were on all older model releases. SJs, Breds columbias etc.
these are fake. Shape is very off, 23s look off, PL cut is high
- 5,692
- 1,762
Actually I know exactly which LC you're talking about and those Concords were the '00 releases which did have the backwards jumpman still on the left shoe. The more recent retro which are the '11 release have the right facing jumpman on both shoes which is probably what you are referring to. But I can give you the details as to why the pair posted in this thread are fake.
As I mentioned the whole shape of the shoe is off. The heel of the midsoles are way too round and should come to a point. The 23's are completely wrong and shouldn't have a space between the 2 and 3 unless they are the releases before '01. The patent leather is super dull when it should be shiny. The rope laces are way too thin. The toe caps are the wrong shape and are milky looking when they should be see through. The carbon fiber on the soles is also not carbon fiber at all.
- 43
- 11
Ok, I appreciate it n I will agree with u, do u at least think they r descent replicas, can I get away with wearing them or try to sell them?
- 43
- 11
Btw 88, I do a set of the 23 fix, u think that will help if I put them on there or don't even waste using them ATM?
Thanks
- 5,692
- 1,762
Hard to say. People get away with selling the better fakes all the time which is why they get around so much and are legit checked on here everyday. To me, a good replica (even though I don't support wearing/selling replicas) are ones that are really hard to tell apart from the authentic ones. Which these are not. You wouldn't be able to wear these and get away with it being around the genuine sneaker heads that can spot fakes on feet. You would be able to get away with the better fakes that you can only tell are fake from the back of the shoes if you wear them with jeans covering the back. You would not be able to get away with selling these IMO even if you made the 23 immaculate because the whole shoe is off. I'm sure the box for these are also super off and these releases didn't come with paper stuffing inserts for the shoes, they came with the red shoe trees that all the retro 11's come with.
- 5,692
- 1,762
If you don't mind, could you post pics of the box and what it comes with so I could tell you the differences from the authentic boxes?
