bcdagr8
Banned
- Jan 19, 2013
- 2,806
- 422
Sorry not spending 200 on LeBrons
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rather not spend my money on either. A rip off is a rip off no matter how you justify it.I'm not happy about the price increase of the Lebrons but I would rather spend that money than pay for retros with the usual quality and I usually don't harp on JB retro quality because it is said time and time again. But the lebron 10 is built like a tank and the comfort is extraordinary! People will spend money on AJ 3s with NA on the heel which which can't out perform these so why not get something that will be more bang for your buck imo?
What visible Zoom? The Lebron IX has Max Air in the back and Zoom Air in the front.More Air Max bags? I'm starting to miss regular Zoom being in LeBrons. I also wonder what happened to the Visible Zoom they used last year...seems like a one and done for Nike.
What visible Zoom? The Lebron IX has Max Air in the back and Zoom Air in the front.
The details I've read about the shoe sound like a Frankenstein shoe of Nike's innovations all on one shoe... WHich can be either really good, or really horrible.
See what I mean?
200 is where the I draw the line.
I'm not kiddin.
And if people are smart they'll do the same.
$200 is borderline OD. "The most ambitious project in the history of Nike" I hope they hold up to that considering the Xs kind of took a step backwards.
No damns given by Nike on these prices raises
If I could elaborate on it believe I would but that price is child's play compared to a particular gem Nike has on deck. Quite pricey it is
If I could elaborate on it believe I would but that price is child's play compared to a particular gem Nike has on deck. Quite pricey it is
If I could elaborate on it believe I would but that price is child's play compared to a particular gem Nike has on deck. Quite pricey it is