LC: Jordan 11 Bred Production date 6/13/12-6/29/12

[taru gokuyami]

Hi Guys,

I'm planning to cop a pair of bred 11's, everything is on point based on the detailed pics sent by the seller. The only thing that bothers me are the production dates (6/13/12-6/29/12). He's claiming that this are from the restocked pairs last March 13and are not early release pairs. Can anyone share their thoughts? Appreciate all your responses.

 

[taru gokuyami]

Here are the photos, appreciate all feedback.

 

[yesupreme]

Looks legit to me bro

 

[taru gokuyami]

Thanks! Just worried about the production date but I came accross sellers selling ER pairs with a prod date of 7/11/2012. Hope more members share their insights about this.

 

[fidelramos]

Send a pic of paper and top view of ankle collar

 

[isniker]

2012 bred 11s made in 2013?

shoes were finished on 6/29/13, but he bought it March 13..did he have a time machine

restocked pairs are made the same time as the release date ones, they just store them in the warehouse

are you in the PI.. these shouldnt have an msrp tag.. unless he got it in the us

 

[taru gokuyami]

Sorry typo error, should be 6/13/12-6/29/12. Seller claims that the pairs were restock pairs from the breds restock last March 2013. Yes, I'm from PI.

 

[taru gokuyami]

here's the paper pic as well as the ankle collar

 

[fidelramos]

Legit yan kabayan

 

[taru gokuyami]

Thanks Mr.President!

 

[timmybrixxx]

1000% GMs man.. dont cop them.. 23s are off, paper is off, dates are off etc..

23s should look like this..

2 RD pairs

nevermind the words, just look at the 23..

 

[taru gokuyami]

@Timmybrixxx The "23" looks squared to me. It might just be the angle of the camera shot. I'm gonna send another pic with the same angle as you posted above. About the paper, it's light and barely readable. The collar is thin as well. Hopefully more insights anyway Thanks for the feedback, appreciate it.

 

[timmybrixxx]

@Timmybrixxx The "23" looks squared to me. It might just be the angle of the camera shot. I'm gonna send another pic with the same angle as you posted above. About the paper, it's light and barely readable. The collar is thin as well. Hopefully more insights anyway Thanks for the feedback, appreciate it.

Its not just about it being square..Look at the negative space in the 23 logo on all 3 pair in my ref pics...the dark areas of the 2 and 3 should be equal in size to the white areas If that makes since.. Now compare to yours in pic 2.. The 23 is stretched so that the negative space is inconsistent.. this is a different logo all together..Close but not the same IMO. IDK the paper seems dark to me, not as dark as some ive seen though so maybe it is the lighting.. As for the collars they are shaped nice but they look a little thick.. maybe im just picking.. get a few more opinions, but IMO that 23 is a deal breaker.  

 

[taru gokuyami]

@timmy posted a pic of the 23 at the back up close, i don't see any difference with the cool gray's above. Please advise

 

[timmybrixxx]

@timmy posted a pic of the 23 at the back up close, i don't see any difference with the cool gray's above. Please advise

 

 Here I marked the areas of interest for you..

Also I noticed you are new to NT.. When people on here help you.... please give the comments you feel helped a thumbs up( the little green thumbs up down there) This is your way of saying thanks and our way to build rep.                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                            I

                                                                                                                                                                                                           V

 

[opilla36]

Hi Guys,

I'm planning to cop a pair of bred 11's, everything is on point based on the detailed pics sent by the seller. The only thing that bothers me are the production dates (6/13/12-6/29/12). He's claiming that this are from the restocked pairs last March 13and are not early release pairs. Can anyone share their thoughts? Appreciate all your responses.

The only thing that makes me nervous is the patent leather cut in the back.  If you notice the cut from the pic TIMMYBRIXXX posted his are cut much lower and more of a U shape to the patent leather.

 

[Mr Dink]

The two week production date stems from when Air Randy and such were selling early release pairs. I remember last year NTers were posting, "Why is my production date so close together?" after buying them in August.

 

[alehkcis]

View media item 680828

View media item 680832 OP the shoes you posted the patent leather was cut very similar to my buddy's pair which is above and if you compare to the legit pair you can clearly see they are different from a legit pair

 

[aksuited]

You don't even need to see the shoes....once you mentioned the two week production date span....it's a wrap. 100% GM garbage.

 

[taru gokuyami]

t

View media item 680828

View media item 680832 OP the shoes you posted the patent leather was cut very similar to my buddy's pair which is above and if you compare to the legit pair you can clearly see they are different from a legit pair

the bottom shoe is legit, right?

 

[alehkcis]

t
the bottom shoe is legit, right?

Yup, bottom pair is legit

 

[taru gokuyami]

Yup, bottom pair is legit

well if that's the case i don't see any difference on the leather's cut. It seems the same exact shoe, even the spacing between the leather and the jumpman is the same.

 

[aksuited]

The 23 is off, the production dates are wrong. What else do you need? It's GM garbage breh...end of story.

 

[opilla36]

You come on here all get defensive but your the one that's asking for a LC..??
If your so sure they're legit then why you even post them? Stop being in denial bro, they're GM.

PERIOD.

 

[taru gokuyami]

You come on here all get defensive but your the one that's asking for a LC..??

If your so sure they're legit then why you even post them? Stop being in denial bro, they're GM.


PERIOD.

Just checking all angles man, I'm not in denial neither am I saying that you guys are wrong. I'm just pointing the similarities on the patent leather. You guys are the experts and I'm just here to ask for objective observations. The reason why I'm asking is just in case I see another pair, I'll surely know if it's legit or not. There's no harm in asking but anyway I thank you all for your kind responses.