- 1,553
- 386
theyre sure not that bad but on the other hand theyre kind of boring, theres really nothing happen on them, dunno but for such a statement shoes there issomething missing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by MoNeyLiCiouS
Originally Posted by anticop23
looks like the TMacs....
co-signed, beat me to the punch.
Originally Posted by AirUpHere23
I'm sorry, I just can not justify paying 175 and up for a shoe that looks to say the least very bland. Unlike the older models like the Jordan IV which had the unique "wings" feature or the Jordan III with the "elephant print" or the Jordan V with the "3m tongue" these XX3's don't scream out all time classic to me. I don't care about the stitching, I want something that is worth the price the company is dishing out to the people and these considerably fail the test.
THESE ARE THE BEST JORDANS SINCE THE XIVs.
XX>>>>XX3
XVI>>XX3
Originally Posted by vocaldigital23
These are fakes.