- Aug 2, 2008
- 37,548
- 13,039
Absolutely.
We were pawns. There was no significant interest in LA, it was if we say we'll sign 1 year, somebody will come over the top with 2, maybe 3.
**LA LAKERS THREAD** Sitting on 17! 2023-2024 offseason begins
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
Absolutely.
We were pawns. There was no significant interest in LA, it was if we say we'll sign 1 year, somebody will come over the top with 2, maybe 3.
- May 17, 2007
- 25,125
- 23,904
Magic & Rob got played 
If we end up Rondo
If we end up Rondo
- Jun 18, 2013
- 388
- 165
wow so magic's smile wasn't enough?
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
**** George Hill.
Never wanted him and his slim shady *** head anyways.
Never wanted him and his slim shady *** head anyways.
- May 17, 2007
- 25,125
- 23,904
But this is a "Laker year" not a rebuilding one 
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,028
- 85,616
Rondo 
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,759
- 47,966
damn it
- May 17, 2007
- 25,125
- 23,904
When we sign Rondo and give the Celtics a top 5 pick next
Last edited:
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,357
- 40,807
Rondo
Good grief
Last edited:
- Jul 18, 2012
- 8,555
- 8,435
Whoever wants a one year deal can come get it. Otherwise how is the FO getting played?
- Sep 5, 2010
- 92,782
- 129,023
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,028
- 85,616
They just complaining to complain. I guess they would have rather us get right back into a Mosgov situation.
- Oct 14, 2012
- 2,756
- 3,196
Mamba out here looking like a Trump faithful.
But I don't think this is a big deal. Hill went with stability which was expected. Lakers are going all in next summer, and there's a lot of smoke about certain guys wanting to come here (no idea why though they won't win a ring, unless Ball and Ingram make huge leaps very quickly).
But I don't think this is a big deal. Hill went with stability which was expected. Lakers are going all in next summer, and there's a lot of smoke about certain guys wanting to come here (no idea why though they won't win a ring, unless Ball and Ingram make huge leaps very quickly).
- May 17, 2007
- 25,125
- 23,904
Magic & Rob tried to sell Hill on the Lakers brand and he passed. The same thing that's been going on for the past 5 years happened again. Winning will always matter more than playing for the "brand" of the Lakers.
I don't mind cuz Hill made the right choice, financial security is always the move, but its still something to note. Next summer is where the real judgment will occur.
I don't mind cuz Hill made the right choice, financial security is always the move, but its still something to note. Next summer is where the real judgment will occur.
Last edited:
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,028
- 85,616
How do you know this? Looks like they tried to sell him on a 1 year deal and he got the same money for 2 guaranteed and some for a 3rd.
- May 17, 2007
- 25,125
- 23,904
Because some of y'all act like all Magic has to do is smile at someone and they're gunna sign here.
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,028
- 85,616
So you just made something up?
Los Angeles
formerly bright nikes
- Apr 11, 2004
- 23,225
- 4,898
well done
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,357
- 40,807
Hill went with the bag, plain and simple
FO isn't getting anyone to take a 1 year deal other than those looking to bounce back from injuries or journeymen.
FO isn't getting anyone to take a 1 year deal other than those looking to bounce back from injuries or journeymen.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 3,294
- 801
You do it all the time too bro chill
You put your conjecture and hyperbole on Magic & Rob too. In a sense we all do cuz we don't really no what they are thinking
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,028
- 85,616
You do it all the time too bro chill
You put your conjecture and hyperbole on Magic & Rob too. In a sense we all do cuz we don't really no what they are thinking
That's a lie but ok
- Nov 1, 2011
- 2,433
- 1,128
Lol yea man, hard to blame magic for this one. Dudes need to stop reaching.
It was smart to go after him, Kings just offered what we wouldn't.
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
I don't think we got played as much as we were just unfortunate in this situation.
Kings offering him that deal is completely stupid and a fluke. No other organization in the Kings shoes with the amount of young guards on their roster would offer Hill that deal.
But Kangz gonna Kang.
If it wasnt for them we would have had Hill IMO.
**** luck. Oh well, it is what it is. He clearly wanted financial security over playing with the Lakers and thats fine, I cant hate on that because if i was in his shoes id probably want the same thing.
Thats a lot of money to pass up on which can do a lot of good for family and friends.
Kings offering him that deal is completely stupid and a fluke. No other organization in the Kings shoes with the amount of young guards on their roster would offer Hill that deal.
But Kangz gonna Kang.
If it wasnt for them we would have had Hill IMO.
**** luck. Oh well, it is what it is. He clearly wanted financial security over playing with the Lakers and thats fine, I cant hate on that because if i was in his shoes id probably want the same thing.
Thats a lot of money to pass up on which can do a lot of good for family and friends.
Last edited:
- Apr 24, 2006
- 18,753
- 13,103
Good decision by Hill taking the money
Looks like we might get stuck with non shooting Rondo or Stuckey
Is Jordan Farmar still available? [emoji]127995[/emoji]
Looks like we might get stuck with non shooting Rondo or Stuckey
Is Jordan Farmar still available? [emoji]127995[/emoji]
Last edited:
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
:x IS THIS WHAT THE WORLD HAS COME TO FOR THE LAKERS ORGANIZATION
Last edited:
