- Jul 29, 2001
- 20,671
- 10,735
Some of you dudes are straight dumb.. cats stay disrespecting Timmy like he ain't the greatest PF of all time
There's really no comparison. Like I said, people just love Garnett way too much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some of you dudes are straight dumb.. cats stay disrespecting Timmy like he ain't the greatest PF of all time
Some of you guys are straight up disrespecting Tim Duncan
Dude is the epitome of consistency. And Duncan never had nearly the same level of talent on his teams as Kobe did (does).
NEVER? You can not be serious.
Duncan has had Parker and Manu on his team for 10 years now. Those dudes are better than any player any teammate Kobe had not named Shaq. Shaq has not been on the team for 8 years now.
Some of you guys are straight up disrespecting Tim Duncan
Dude is the epitome of consistency. And Duncan never had nearly the same level of talent on his teams as Kobe did (does).
NEVER? You can not be serious.
Duncan has had Parker and Manu on his team for 10 years now. Those dudes are better than any player any teammate Kobe had not named Shaq. Shaq has not been on the team for 8 years now.
The Spurs would trade both of them for Pau Gasol NOW.
2000 NBA Finals
Shaq- 38 PPG, 17 RPG, 2.5 APG, 2.7 BPG, 61% FG 96/157----6 games
Kobe-16 PPG, 5 RPG, 4 APG, 1.4 BPG, 36% FG%, 33/90----5 games
MVP= Shaq. Shaq performs MUCH better than Bryant who shoots a pathetic 36 percent. Also Shaq was doubled covered while Kobe was left with less coverage but even then Shaq did much better.
2001 NBA Finals
Shaq- 33 PPG, 16 RPG, 5 APG, 3.5 BPG, 63/110 57% FG-----5 games
Kobe- 24 PPG, 8 RPG, 6 APG, 1.4 BPG, 44/106 41% FG------5 games
MVP= Shaq. Shaq performs MUCH better than Bryant who shoots 41%.. Also Shaq was doubled covered while Kobe was left with less coverage but even then Shaq did much better.
2002 NBA Finals
Shaq- 37 PPG, 12.25 RPG, 4 APG, 2.75 BPG, 50/84 60% FG----4 games
Kobe-26 PPG, 5.75 RPG, 5 APG, .75 BPG, 36/70 51% FG-------4 games
MVP= Shaq again. Same old story- Shaq gets doubled coverage yet he still out performs Kobe big time.
Total average stats for 3 championships (15 games)=
Shaq=36 PPG, 15.4 RPG, 3.7 APG, 3 BPG, 209/351 60% FG, Double coverage
Kobe=20 PPG, 6 RPG, 4.6 APG, 1 BPG, 113/266 42% FG, Single coverage
hell the spurs woulda traded all 3 of em for bynum if they could when ever the lakers start to decline kobe gets players donated to him .. pau, nash, dwight this is gettin rediculous n if this dnt work then what u gonna give him rose blake and durant to end his career smh the league is fixed lolNEVER? You can not be serious.
Duncan has had Parker and Manu on his team for 10 years now. Those dudes are better than any player any teammate Kobe had not named Shaq. Shaq has not been on the team for 8 years now.
maybe not 10 but they win atleast 4 and thats the truthGive prime T-Mac the Shaq that Kobe had and they 10-peat
thisSome of you dudes are straight dumb.. cats stay disrespecting Timmy like he ain't the greatest PF of all time
Anyone want to tell me why kobe never got a finals mvp during the shaq era 3peat???
Also, not just Finals MVP, but why was Kobe NEVER league MVP during that timeframe as well? Anyone??
Well, Shaq only got one MVP in that time frame and it was in 2000 when Kobe was still improving. You figure that the most dominant big man of all time would end up with more than one MVP during a 3-peat, but after 2000, Shaq got none for the same reason Kobe never got one: they used to get split votes between the two during these years so it was hard for either one of them to win the MVP award because they were both essential to the other's success.
There are going to be extremists on both sides, the haters are going to make him out to be a role player like Steve Kerr and some of the "lovers" are going to say he was better than MJ. The objective people know he wasn't either, but he was still a great player who was just as important as Shaq during the championship years.
It's funny all the stuff anti Kobe's come up with, riding Shaq and all that, but he was a top 5 player in the entire league at that time.
He was all NBA from 01 on. He was 2nd team all NBA in 2000, and that was after missing 6 weeks with a broken hand.
So was Shaq a "better" player, than a 21 year old? Sure. Was Kobe some run of the mill good player? Not even close. He was one of the 5 best players in the NBA. The Lakers were just smart enough to have 2 of those 5.
Depends what you are taking into account.Duncan > Kobe
That's great and all champ, but at the end of the day Kobe was #2 on his team. That's not Kobe's fault, but it is what it is. There's big brother, and then there's little brother.............there's Batman and then there's Robin.
Funny how Kobe haters completely ignored the fact that the teams the Lakers play in the West playoff were better than the team they play in the Finals
The Spurs, Kings, Portland etc would have made the Finals on the pathetic weak eastern conference.
Just look at what Kobe did to the Spurs, Kings and Blazer. Somehow all that work get sweep under the rug
The 2nd and 3rd Finals was a cakewalk. The West Playoff was where the real Finals happened during those years