- 8,607
- 56
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
Spoiler [+]
BONG!
Kim Kardashian is on a beach with her sister.
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by hombrelobo,
- Start date
BONG!
- 4,951
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
Post up a high resolution pic at least. The pic on the left looks shopped. Get's a higher quality pic so we can compare.Originally Posted by ILLIONAIRE
Spoiler [+]
BONG!
Also where are her scars then? Everyone who has a fake butt has scars, where are Kim's?
- 4,951
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
Post up a high resolution pic at least. The pic on the left looks shopped. Get's a higher quality pic so we can compare.Originally Posted by ILLIONAIRE
Spoiler [+]
BONG!
Also where are her scars then? Everyone who has a fake butt has scars, where are Kim's?
- 7,122
- 1,149
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2003
Originally Posted by ILLIONAIRE
Spoiler [+]
BONG!
hmmmm
Spoiler [+]
still want
- 7,122
- 1,149
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2003
Originally Posted by ILLIONAIRE
Spoiler [+]
BONG!
hmmmm
Spoiler [+]
still want
- 8,607
- 56
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
WHEN A WOMAN'S BUTT LOOKS BIG IN A PIC, NT SAYS IT'S SHOPPED.
WHEN A WOMAN'S BUTT LOOKS SMALL IN A PIC, NT SAYS IT'S SHOPPED.
I quit.
- 8,607
- 56
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
WHEN A WOMAN'S BUTT LOOKS BIG IN A PIC, NT SAYS IT'S SHOPPED.
WHEN A WOMAN'S BUTT LOOKS SMALL IN A PIC, NT SAYS IT'S SHOPPED.
I quit.
- 4,951
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
You lookin like LeQuit right now, just go find some higher resolution pics to prove that her @!% is fake.
- 4,951
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
You lookin like LeQuit right now, just go find some higher resolution pics to prove that her @!% is fake.
- 6,104
- 51
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2004
Originally Posted by JD214
Kim K>>>
- 6,104
- 51
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2004
Originally Posted by JD214
Kim K>>>
- 1,004
- 10
- Joined
- May 30, 2008
my girl kourt
why is she with that fool scott
why is she with that fool scott
- 1,004
- 10
- Joined
- May 30, 2008
my girl kourt
why is she with that fool scott
why is she with that fool scott
- 5,206
- 358
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
Lovin' that booty crack!
Someone make a wallpaper with those last two pics
Someone make a wallpaper with those last two pics
- 5,206
- 358
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
Lovin' that booty crack!
Someone make a wallpaper with those last two pics
Someone make a wallpaper with those last two pics
- 1,480
- 1,020
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2000
I know that most of NT only thinks the women exist in pictures on the Internet...but, believe it or not...they DO EXIST...and in real life...away from your keyboard!
Fact is that women can look drastically different from day to day and week to week for any number of reasons...hormones, the clothes they are wearing, etc...so, just because you have a couple of pictures that you found on a blog, side by side, doesn't mean you have any proof...she is a petite woman and a little bit of weight, even water weight from week to week can fluctuate her appearance...
All that facial picture illustrates is that she has lost some of the fat on her face, which DOES go away with weight loss and exercise and that she does do a much better job with her makeup and most noticeably in that picture, she reshaped her eyebrows...
What is the longest that Kim has went without a photograph being taken of her...you have to have time to heal if you have facial plastic surgery...or butt implants (BTW...that is absurd)...where are these WEEKS without pictures since 2006...she has got to be one of the Top 10 most photographed women in the world since then...where is the proof of time away from photographers that would be needed to heal?
Anyway...she is bad, the baddest in fact...just because she is popular doesn't mean that she isn't gorgeous...she isn't some General Release AF1's...it is OK to say that you like her, even if the cool thing to say is that she is overrated and that there are badder chicks walking the streets of DC
JM
Fact is that women can look drastically different from day to day and week to week for any number of reasons...hormones, the clothes they are wearing, etc...so, just because you have a couple of pictures that you found on a blog, side by side, doesn't mean you have any proof...she is a petite woman and a little bit of weight, even water weight from week to week can fluctuate her appearance...
All that facial picture illustrates is that she has lost some of the fat on her face, which DOES go away with weight loss and exercise and that she does do a much better job with her makeup and most noticeably in that picture, she reshaped her eyebrows...
What is the longest that Kim has went without a photograph being taken of her...you have to have time to heal if you have facial plastic surgery...or butt implants (BTW...that is absurd)...where are these WEEKS without pictures since 2006...she has got to be one of the Top 10 most photographed women in the world since then...where is the proof of time away from photographers that would be needed to heal?
Anyway...she is bad, the baddest in fact...just because she is popular doesn't mean that she isn't gorgeous...she isn't some General Release AF1's...it is OK to say that you like her, even if the cool thing to say is that she is overrated and that there are badder chicks walking the streets of DC
JM
- 1,480
- 1,020
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2000
I know that most of NT only thinks the women exist in pictures on the Internet...but, believe it or not...they DO EXIST...and in real life...away from your keyboard!
Fact is that women can look drastically different from day to day and week to week for any number of reasons...hormones, the clothes they are wearing, etc...so, just because you have a couple of pictures that you found on a blog, side by side, doesn't mean you have any proof...she is a petite woman and a little bit of weight, even water weight from week to week can fluctuate her appearance...
All that facial picture illustrates is that she has lost some of the fat on her face, which DOES go away with weight loss and exercise and that she does do a much better job with her makeup and most noticeably in that picture, she reshaped her eyebrows...
What is the longest that Kim has went without a photograph being taken of her...you have to have time to heal if you have facial plastic surgery...or butt implants (BTW...that is absurd)...where are these WEEKS without pictures since 2006...she has got to be one of the Top 10 most photographed women in the world since then...where is the proof of time away from photographers that would be needed to heal?
Anyway...she is bad, the baddest in fact...just because she is popular doesn't mean that she isn't gorgeous...she isn't some General Release AF1's...it is OK to say that you like her, even if the cool thing to say is that she is overrated and that there are badder chicks walking the streets of DC
JM
Fact is that women can look drastically different from day to day and week to week for any number of reasons...hormones, the clothes they are wearing, etc...so, just because you have a couple of pictures that you found on a blog, side by side, doesn't mean you have any proof...she is a petite woman and a little bit of weight, even water weight from week to week can fluctuate her appearance...
All that facial picture illustrates is that she has lost some of the fat on her face, which DOES go away with weight loss and exercise and that she does do a much better job with her makeup and most noticeably in that picture, she reshaped her eyebrows...
What is the longest that Kim has went without a photograph being taken of her...you have to have time to heal if you have facial plastic surgery...or butt implants (BTW...that is absurd)...where are these WEEKS without pictures since 2006...she has got to be one of the Top 10 most photographed women in the world since then...where is the proof of time away from photographers that would be needed to heal?
Anyway...she is bad, the baddest in fact...just because she is popular doesn't mean that she isn't gorgeous...she isn't some General Release AF1's...it is OK to say that you like her, even if the cool thing to say is that she is overrated and that there are badder chicks walking the streets of DC
JM
- 4,951
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
Originally Posted by jmadidas2001
I know that most of NT only thinks the women exist in pictures on the Internet...but, believe it or not...they DO EXIST...and in real life...away from your keyboard!
Fact is that women can look drastically different from day to day and week to week for any number of reasons...hormones, the clothes they are wearing, etc...so, just because you have a couple of pictures that you found on a blog, side by side, doesn't mean you have any proof...she is a petite woman and a little bit of weight, even water weight from week to week can fluctuate her appearance...
All that facial picture illustrates is that she has lost some of the fat on her face, which DOES go away with weight loss and exercise and that she does do a much better job with her makeup and most noticeably in that picture, she reshaped her eyebrows...
What is the longest that Kim has went without a photograph being taken of her...you have to have time to heal if you have facial plastic surgery...or butt implants (BTW...that is absurd)...where are these WEEKS without pictures since 2006...she has got to be one of the Top 10 most photographed women in the world since then...where is the proof of time away from photographers that would be needed to heal?
Anyway...she is bad, the baddest in fact...just because she is popular doesn't mean that she isn't gorgeous...she isn't some General Release AF1's...it is OK to say that you like her, even if the cool thing to say is that she is overrated and that there are badder chicks walking the streets of DC
JM
- 4,951
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
Originally Posted by jmadidas2001
I know that most of NT only thinks the women exist in pictures on the Internet...but, believe it or not...they DO EXIST...and in real life...away from your keyboard!
Fact is that women can look drastically different from day to day and week to week for any number of reasons...hormones, the clothes they are wearing, etc...so, just because you have a couple of pictures that you found on a blog, side by side, doesn't mean you have any proof...she is a petite woman and a little bit of weight, even water weight from week to week can fluctuate her appearance...
All that facial picture illustrates is that she has lost some of the fat on her face, which DOES go away with weight loss and exercise and that she does do a much better job with her makeup and most noticeably in that picture, she reshaped her eyebrows...
What is the longest that Kim has went without a photograph being taken of her...you have to have time to heal if you have facial plastic surgery...or butt implants (BTW...that is absurd)...where are these WEEKS without pictures since 2006...she has got to be one of the Top 10 most photographed women in the world since then...where is the proof of time away from photographers that would be needed to heal?
Anyway...she is bad, the baddest in fact...just because she is popular doesn't mean that she isn't gorgeous...she isn't some General Release AF1's...it is OK to say that you like her, even if the cool thing to say is that she is overrated and that there are badder chicks walking the streets of DC
JM
- 3,784
- 12
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
this chick is so beat i can't fathom finding her being attractiveOriginally Posted by Jabawokee
Coco >
- 3,784
- 12
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
this chick is so beat i can't fathom finding her being attractiveOriginally Posted by Jabawokee
Coco >
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 136,156
- 116,992
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
Originally Posted by boogie bwoy
Originally Posted by hombrelobo
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 136,156
- 116,992
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
Originally Posted by boogie bwoy
Originally Posted by hombrelobo
Similar threads
