antonlavey
Banned
- 28,210
- 847
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
finalllllllllllllly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Kentucky state Rep. Lonnie Napier (R-Lancaster) has introduced a billthat would enforce random drug testing for all adult Kentuckiansreceiving welfare, food stamps or Medicaid, which he told HuffPostwould "get people off drugs" and save money for the state.Originally Posted by bilingue23
Originally Posted by Nawth21
That won't get folks off drugs.
That's not the point. The point would be to stop our tax dollars from going to people who can't help themselves.
Originally Posted by torgriffith
Do ya'll have any idea how much drug test cost to companies?
What happened to smart spending and cutting cost?
Originally Posted by Essential1
"A decade ago, Michigan implemented mandatory testing in three welfare offices. Out of 258 new and continuing applicants tested, 21 tested positive for illicit substances. All but three of these women tested positive for marijuana only. In light of such experiences, few states have chosen to pursue similar efforts," said Harold Pollack, the Helen Ross Professor of Social Service Administration at the University of Chicago.
How about these !#$#!%%% just try to create legislation and admit they think all black people are criminals instead of giving a low-key nod to a stereotype they created, and when they found an instance of that stereotype in an actuality they use it as justification to apply it to everyone.....
OOOOooooOOOOOOooooooOOOOOOoooooh..... she told you!Originally Posted by Nawth21
Kentucky state Rep. Lonnie Napier (R-Lancaster) has introduced a billthat would enforce random drug testing for all adult Kentuckiansreceiving welfare, food stamps or Medicaid, which he told HuffPostwould "get people off drugs" and save money for the state.Originally Posted by bilingue23
Originally Posted by Nawth21
That won't get folks off drugs.
That's not the point. The point would be to stop our tax dollars from going to people who can't help themselves.
That's one of the points they make in the article.
Originally Posted by lobotomybeats
This will be a perfect law for the children of these begging drug-users. Screw those little bastards and their emaciated little arms reaching for handouts. If momma smokes pot, screw the little kids!
Originally Posted by Murda He
OOOOooooOOOOOOooooooOOOOOOoooooh..... she told you!Originally Posted by Nawth21
Kentucky state Rep. Lonnie Napier (R-Lancaster) has introduced a billthat would enforce random drug testing for all adult Kentuckiansreceiving welfare, food stamps or Medicaid, which he told HuffPostwould "get people off drugs" and save money for the state.Originally Posted by bilingue23
Originally Posted by Nawth21
That won't get folks off drugs.
That's not the point. The point would be to stop our tax dollars from going to people who can't help themselves.
That's one of the points they make in the article.
It's called the "soft racism of the Left".Originally Posted by BostonThreeParty
Originally Posted by Essential1
How about these !#$#!%%% just try to create legislation and admit they think all black people are criminals instead of giving a low-key nod to a stereotype they created, and when they found an instance of that stereotype in an actuality they use it as justification to apply it to everyone.....
so are you suggesting that every one that is on Welfare is Black?
seems like it to me.
Shush RillaAll I'm getting at is I didn't pull that notion out of thin air. Of course that's not the *real* point, regardless of what the article says, but it is mentioned numerous times in the article to give it a more 'humanitarian' feel to it on some "Oh we want to help the people get off drugs" steeze when in reality they just don't want to spend money on them.
The government shouldn't have to spend money on them.
Let me ask you a question. If you and me are both in school and there is a huge test in one week. You spend your whole week studying, putting off going out to parties and things of that nature so you will help yourself get a better grade. Me on the other hand would rather go out drinking the weekend before the exam, putting of studying and saying screw it, I don't care.
Are you going to come up to me and offer to help me? Would you waste your resources trying to help me, when you could continue helping yourself? Are you going to feel bad for me that I failed the test? Why should you offer to help me when I don't want to help myself?
This is the same issue. The legislation is saying we dont mind giving assistance and helping if people want it and are willing to work for it, but why are we helping others who don't give a damn about themsevles and continue living a lifestyle that is only hindering their ability to provide food, shelter, etc.
Originally Posted by PoloLax
Shush RillaAll I'm getting at is I didn't pull that notion out of thin air. Of course that's not the *real* point, regardless of what the article says, but it is mentioned numerous times in the article to give it a more 'humanitarian' feel to it on some "Oh we want to help the people get off drugs" steeze when in reality they just don't want to spend money on them.
Originally Posted by IMASOLEMAN18
good, there needs to be stricter laws with government handouts, my friends mother (white) was asked for the title to her $1000 dollar car to ensure that she was not trying to cheat the government while the african american women with 24's on her brand new dodge durango wasn't asked about anything
OOOOooooOOOOOOooooooOOOOOOoooooh..... you told me!Originally Posted by Nawth21
Originally Posted by Murda He
OOOOooooOOOOOOooooooOOOOOOoooooh..... she told you!Originally Posted by Nawth21
Kentucky state Rep. Lonnie Napier (R-Lancaster) has introduced a billthat would enforce random drug testing for all adult Kentuckiansreceiving welfare, food stamps or Medicaid, which he told HuffPostwould "get people off drugs" and save money for the state.Originally Posted by bilingue23
Originally Posted by Nawth21
That won't get folks off drugs.
That's not the point. The point would be to stop our tax dollars from going to people who can't help themselves.
That's one of the points they make in the article.
Shush RillaAll I'm getting at is I didn't pull that notion out of thin air. Of course that's not the *real* point, regardless of what the article says, but it is mentioned numerous times in the article to give it a more 'humanitarian' feel to it on some "Oh we want to help the people get off drugs" steeze when in reality they just don't want to spend money on them.
Originally Posted by IMASOLEMAN18
good, there needs to be stricter laws with government handouts, my friends mother (white) was asked for the title to her $1000 dollar car to ensure that she was not trying to cheat the government while the african american women with 24's on her brand new dodge durango wasn't asked about anything