JP Morgan bankrolled Epstein even though he was flagged as “potentially problematic”

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't be a coward and @ Meth then

If your beef is with moderation on NT
He did already. Irony how he thinks NT is selective while he's the one asking threads to be closed.



Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 16.18.29 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 16.18.41 PM.png



He's too cowardly to say this is about his icon Kanye, when he mentions double standards in the original post.

"Typical double standards."

"This isn't about Kanye or what he believes.

This thread subject is factual. Not an opinion."


But he couldn't even get his fact straight on why JP Morgan stepped away from Kanye.
 
I see many people reading and responding to that thread.

Look here's you.
Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 17.14.54 PM.png


" Don't care about Kanye and this thread is not about him so stop trying to make it about him."
Oh look, you made this thread just ten minutes after this post IN THE OFFICIAL YE THREAD IN MUSIC.
Screen Shot 2022-10-29 at 17.16.04 PM.png


RustyShackleford RustyShackleford
 
Last edited:
:lol:For Kanye who's legit on record with mental issues and prescriptions and who we've seen decline over the years.
 
Cats keep bringing up Kanye yet Kanye was never mentioned in the original post 🤔...

Dudes want this to desperately be about Kanye to vent their fake outrage when it's not.

This is about JP Morgan and Epstein. They could've exposed him and potentially saved these victims if they had done the right thing and contacted authorities earlier.
 
Imagine being exposed on your own thread for being an antisemite with definitive proof, and your best comeback is calling me a cornball and possessing weirdo energy.

And then imagine putting on a bravado/ and playing coy after everyone sees RIGHT THROUGH YOU, and complain about fake outrage when his initial fake outrage is based on outdated information from an article in 2019.

And then imagine moving the goalpost after being exposed to : " They could've exposed him and potentially saved these victims if they had done the right thing and contacted authorities earlier."

When JPMorgan's advisory was based on court decision as stated in the article you actually posted.

According to the Times, JPMorgan kept Epstein on as a client well past his 2008 guilty plea for soliciting prostitution and despite recommendations from compliance officers that it cut ties with him because of potential legal and reputational risks associated with his accounts.

What is the banks suppose to do when the court already exposed him.

But keep huffing that neo nazi copium. Let that brain rot set in fully.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom