- 19,057
- 9,030
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2013
Don't get why these aren't normal mids yet
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
you know all these pairs popping up are fake right? at least wait till more real deal pictures pop up lol
i want more angles of a official pair, don't crush my hopes!Well this first picture I posted was from a JB held summer preview event…
…and both appear to have Nubuck instead of durabuck.
shut up...this looks like a completely different shoe so complaints are valid
I can't recall the figure exactly, but I paid under $60 a pair for these in 02...That Outlet snag.
I'll grab a pair in August.
(Sigh) Ya know, Ive NEVER been one to complain about quality at all. Im 37, Ive had OGs, retro's, re-retros blah blah blah. Ive always just thought it is what it is and Im happy to get a shoe that brings back alot of memories growing up and thats it. When I heard of the whole "remastering" I cant lie I was hella excited lol. Can someone please tell me what the hell has been "remastered" to look as close to OG as possible? That was the whole plan and point right? The 4's shape clearly still isnt close to OG love, leather I will say is better, but WHY is it impossible for JB to release a black based non-synthetic shoe and give us Durabuck???!!! Durabuck is actually a huge part in what corrects the shape and overall look of the shoes. It brings the richness back to the black color, and makes it not seem so damn stiff. I was all good with the price increase, didnt bother me at all as long as materials were gonna be on point......THIS is far from on point and definitely far from REMASTERED. I really hate that Im complaining and Im truly sorry ur reading me do so.............but DAMN! smh You get excited when u hear a shoe is comin' back, then u see pics and ur like "For real?" Again, my bad for the dumb *** rant ya'll.It's definitely looking like Ashy Larry nubuck on these. I'm out…
![]()
Join the club, at least they aren't as hideous as the 8 lownot a fan of the 6 lows.
any word on price?
Nope Im right there with you bro!! It is exactly what defines the 6s and although I still like 6 lows it does make them less appealing.I've always felt like the VI Low should have holes in the tongue; and the tongue should have been constructed w/ the same rubber/neoprene material as the high.
I realize the tongue isn't as long & the holes would likely serve little function on a low, but they're the defining trademark of the VI, in my eyes.
Maybe I'm the only one.
![]()
I've always felt like the VI Low should have holes in the tongue; and the tongue should have been constructed w/ the same rubber/neoprene material as the high.
I realize the tongue isn't as long & the holes would likely serve little function on a low, but they're the defining trademark of the VI, in my eyes.
Maybe I'm the only one.
![]()
(Sigh) Ya know, Ive NEVER been one to complain about quality at all. Im 37, Ive had OGs, retro's, re-retros blah blah blah. Ive always just thought it is what it is and Im happy to get a shoe that brings back alot of memories growing up and thats it. When I heard of the whole "remastering" I cant lie I was hella excited lol. Can someone please tell me what the hell has been "remastered" to look as close to OG as possible? That was the whole plan and point right? The 4's shape clearly still isnt close to OG love, leather I will say is better, but WHY is it impossible for JB to release a black based non-synthetic shoe and give us Durabuck???!!! Durabuck is actually a huge part in what corrects the shape and overall look of the shoes. It brings the richness back to the black color, and makes it not seem so damn stiff. I was all good with the price increase, didnt bother me at all as long as materials were gonna be on point......THIS is far from on point and definitely far from REMASTERED. I really hate that Im complaining and Im truly sorry ur reading me do so.............but DAMN! smh You get excited when u hear a shoe is comin' back, then u see pics and ur like "For real?" Again, my bad for the dumb *** rant ya'll.
I've always felt like the VI Low should have holes in the tongue; and the tongue should have been constructed w/ the same rubber/neoprene material as the high.
I realize the tongue isn't as long & the holes would likely serve little function on a low, but they're the defining trademark of the VI, in my eyes.
Maybe I'm the only one.
![]()