- 5,384
- 1,893
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2014
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
true...but I love getting wings half off after 7 at the deli wal mart lol ranch and buffalo YESRed > blue
Breds > Broyals
Target >>>>>>>>>> Walmart
Chicagos were a full GR with the exception off Nike.com not having their pairs on release day. What's your false info to prove that they were NOT a GR OG 1??Chicago's weren't no GR stop that nonsense
My man [emoji]128079[/emoji][emoji]127997[/emoji][emoji]128079[/emoji][emoji]127997[/emoji][emoji]128079[/emoji][emoji]127997[/emoji]If they made more pairs, most people in this thread would ***** that they did so, and end up not copping. People wanted Aquas, they made a ton, they sat. Bring back NA on the 3/4/5/6s. They did, they gave us a ton of pairs, and pretty damn good quality. People complained that they sat. Nike's damned if they do and damned if they don't. Produce a ton and they're no longer "cool" and the yeezys/ub jumped over the jumpman. Produce at a level that will create demand and they're jerks who won't give us enough pairs.
Chicagos were a full GR with the exception off Nike.com not having their pairs on release day. What's your false info to prove that they were NOT a GR OG 1??Chicago's weren't no GR stop that nonsense
If they made more pairs, most people in this thread would ***** that they did so, and end up not copping. People wanted Aquas, they made a ton, they sat. Bring back NA on the 3/4/5/6s. They did, they gave us a ton of pairs, and pretty damn good quality. People complained that they sat. Nike's damned if they do and damned if they don't. Produce a ton and they're no longer "cool" and the yeezys/ub jumped over the jumpman. Produce at a level that will create demand and they're jerks who won't give us enough pairs.
We're Chicagos not a available in GS sizes? I'm certain they were as I bought a pair. And I CLEARLY SAID GR OG 1. A 1 GR is NOT EVER on the same levels as other Retros and I'm almost certain you being a MOD knows this.Full GR= family sizing, small regional stores carrying them, and multiple upon multiple size runs . Chicagos were not a full GR
Full GR= family sizing, small regional stores carrying them, and multiple upon multiple size runs . Chicagos were not a full GRWe'reWere Chicagos not a available in GS sizes? I'm certain they were as I bought a pair. And I CLEARLY SAID GR OG 1. A 1 GR is NOT EVER on the same levels as other Retros and I'm almost certain you being a MOD knows this.
An OG 1 (Nike air on tongue/no JUMPMAN on the back/non KO). And NO CHICAGOS WERE NOT IN TODDLER OR INFANT SIZES. 1s with NIKE AIR on the tongue haven't released in toddler and infant sizes in the past 10years. Again this goes to further what I said that OG air Jordan 1s on a GR scale is NOT THE SAME AS OTHER NUMBERED RETROS.What the hell does that even mean? An OG 1 GR. Since the remastered all 1s aside the backboards had the same volume. General release means just that, available in wide quantity in sizes infant-adult. Were Chicago's available in toddler & infant? Thats why phrases like limited GR is an oxymoron and makes zero sense. Its either a GR or limited.
Examples of a GR 1 (Nike air on tongue)
Black and whites, Chicagos, 2016 banned 1s
Every OG color way of these 1s going back to last year has been a GR in terms of 1s. Banneds went the added step by now being available in champs sports which the other two were not.
Examples of a non GR 1( Nike air on tongue)
Frags, DSM, Pinnacles
the 2013 version were going for $800 before the rumor came out that they would be released again...
fair price now?
$500?
$450?
$400?
I COMPLETELY AGREE that all Nike air 1s are in limited quantity when comparing them to other Retros, I've already stated that.You're not grasping my point. Everything you said, I get. Nothing new. You're comparing things that don't equate to the topic at hand. My point is all OG 1s are limited quantity. Yeah on some releases there are more than others, but that still doesn't change the fact. I'll leave it at that.
What about DS 2001s. You think 450ish is fair?I doubt they were actually moving for 8. Im sure 5-600 was the moving rate. Now they're at 400-450 going on average DS.
And what's your false info to prove they were a GR everyone besides you knows they weren'tChicagos were a full GR with the exception off Nike.com not having their pairs on release day. What's your false info to prove that they were NOT a GR OG 1??
He gave you the guidelines of what a general release is. The blk/whts were not a gr. Starting with Chicagos they bumped up allotment per store and the amounts of stores. The allocations favored the states to. No OG 1 has ever been a gr.I COMPLETELY AGREE that all Nike air 1s are in limited quantity when comparing them to other Retros, I've already stated that.
Dont compare 1s and you can throw 2s in there also with other retro releases. THE NUMBERS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN LESS, going back to 2000 and probably before that.
Yeah they def dont move at that 800. I got lucky catching that early summer. Either way i sold off 2 of 5 after the breds announced and at this point am gonna hold my rock and stock. 3rd is trade bait for an LM pair or something but these would be a tough sell for that range. Especially if the release mimics breds. Those recent numbers make the 2013 release look like a chase for the golden ticket.I doubt they were actually moving for 8. Im sure 5-600 was the moving rate. Now they're at 400-450 going on average DS.