- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,630
- 27,195
I thought the flyknit manufacturing process was supposed to significantly reduce Nike's labor and materials cost? I recall hearing numbers like 50% less labor and 30% less wasted material.
If that's true is there any reason, other than hype, that we're being charged $20 more for a flyknit version of the 1?
If anything I would think that Nike should discount flyknit shoes as a more environmentally conscious alternative to their leather-made counterparts. Reward customers for choosing a shoe made of recycled yarn, with less glue and wasted materials.
You're overthinking it. You make good points but Nike doesn't care about that stuff