- 41
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
I don't like her. SOMETHING tells me she's writing just to get readers. I hate those writers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Kidskillz858
The only way to fix the voting for the award and bring back credability to the MVP award is:
The NBA needs to go back how it was before when the players in the league voted for this award.
Nowadays the way the national media is here in the United States there is to much bias and favortism for certain players which leads to some players who dont deserve to win this award winning the MVP award in a season.
Originally Posted by tupac003
I don't even care any more either way.
If kobe or Paul wins I am ok either way.
Regular MVP is virtually a meaningless award if you don't make it to the finals.
i agree. i think steve nash would trade his season mvp for either of billups or parkers finals mvps.
regarding the article, no one take the mvp seriously anyway. it has no meaning. nobody knows what it means, there's no criteria, anyone can win it, sonobody cares. very similar to the mlb mvp.
Originally Posted by yellowmustard
It's absurd that Nash has two MVP's. That is seriously stupid.
I'm a Kobe supporter, and I still stand by my assertion that Kobe is a more skilled player than Michael Jordan was.
"Closet" Kobe Hater.
Kobe hater in denial.
I can smell one from a mile away.
Still, if Kobe doesn't win it this year... Chris Paul SHOULD.
Originally Posted by JDB1523
2 Pages and nobody has mentioned how she said Kobe is more skilled than MJ? Not to mention she didn't bring anything new to my eyes (except that there's people out there beyond NT who actually believe Kobe > MJ). Redundant article, move along.