- 1,441
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2007
as if the warriors need more guards
...dont they know monta'scoming back this season?...but you know crawford can heat it up when hes on his game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Where you at scottsuace88?? You piece of %*+*..we couldnt move Jamal right??
Originally Posted by caLiwestcoast1
as if the warriors need more guards...dont they know monta's coming back this season?...but you know crawford can heat it up when hes on his game
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Zach moves...
Originally Posted by nycknicks105
Where you at scottsuace88?? You piece of %*+*..we couldnt move Jamal right??
Originally Posted by dyyhard
Originally Posted by caLiwestcoast1
as if the warriors need more guards...dont they know monta's coming back this season?...but you know crawford can heat it up when hes on his game
as an outsider, it's a shame they drafted belinelli in the first place ---is he still going to NJ?. might as well make him go back to europe like jacsivisius(#@$)#$@#0 sp??)
winning 5-10 games and have the worst season in all of pro sportsOriginally Posted by outacontrol music
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Zach moves...
What if the Knicks DON'T prove to be a contender and DON'T land LeBron?
Where do you think your franchise will be dude?
Serious question....
Originally Posted by outacontrol music
Where's those dudes who though JC would be around to complement LeBron
edit: some Knick fans FTL
Where you at scottsuace88?? You piece of %*+*..we couldnt move Jamal right??
We'll have the money to throw a bunch of money at someone.Originally Posted by outacontrol music
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Zach moves...
What if the Knicks DON'T prove to be a contender and DON'T land LeBron?
Where do you think your franchise will be dude?
Serious question....
What if the Knicks DON'T prove to be a contender and DON'T land LeBron?
Where do you think your franchise will be dude?
Serious question....
- We don't need to be a contender if we can offer another max contract to a player with LeBron...
that 2nd all star player? we can afford that if Zach moves...hence Amare in picture.
even if LeBron stays...there is a lot of flexibility right now.
When you clear this much cap space (which would happen in dealing Zach), it's not putting all your eggs in one basket.
Bosh?Originally Posted by outacontrol music
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Zach moves...
What if the Knicks DON'T prove to be a contender and DON'T land LeBron?
Where do you think your franchise will be dude?
Serious question....
every move the knicks make in the next year and a half is going to be a strategic move to get lebron in 2010 to you guysOriginally Posted by franchise3
Everybody coming back for the Knicks in these trades contracts' are up after next season.Originally Posted by Kookcle
this trade doesnt make sense
The Knicks already have a bunch of Forwards same with the Warriors and their guards.
Putting NYK in a position to make power moves come '10.
*cough* Lebron *cough*
Originally Posted by outacontrol music
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Zach moves...
What if the Knicks DON'T prove to be a contender and DON'T land LeBron?
Where do you think your franchise will be dude?
Serious question....
Originally Posted by vctry20
every move the knicks make in the next year and a half is going to be a strategic move to get lebron in 2010 to you guysOriginally Posted by franchise3
Everybody coming back for the Knicks in these trades contracts' are up after next season.Originally Posted by Kookcle
this trade doesnt make sense
The Knicks already have a bunch of Forwards same with the Warriors and their guards.
Putting NYK in a position to make power moves come '10.
*cough* Lebron *cough*
[table][tr][td][font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Player[/font][/td] [td]Originally Posted by Jordan4real
i think this is a trade to get more cap room but if there trying to do anything this year this is the dumbest deal i mean the knicks got a million fowards they got no1 to play sg now theyll have to put robinson in now and why does every1 wanna get rid of randolph
besides the 10 mil it clears for lebron in 2010 ... it doesnt make any sense at allOriginally Posted by Kookcle
this trade doesnt make sense
The Knicks already have a bunch of Forwards same with the Warriors and their guards.
it's all about 2010, not about the presentOriginally Posted by Kookcle
this trade doesnt make sense
The Knicks already have a bunch of Forwards same with the Warriors and their guards.