- 24
- 10
is dude wearing '94 retro I's???
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by hightimez420,
- Start date
- 24
- 10
is it '94 retro I's or just the patent leather I's from a few years back??
johnmckoolaid
Banned
- 822
- 41
look more like the patent leather ones
- 24
- 10
it looks like it's a high top tho, thats whats throwing me off
- 4,636
- 23
i dont remember that patent leather 1s from 03 being high tops...i thought they were mids?
Mactastic4167
formerly mac4167
- 5,909
- 1,022
probably fakes
- 940
- 108
QFT
- 1,635
- 10
P.E. ? ? ? ?
- 2,210
- 11
Look like fakes..
- 575
- 10
Fakes for sure. Patent's weren't high's and they didn't have a black tongue tag and it looks like the wings logo is missing as well as therebeing white on the back of the shoe when the patent's had no white on the back.
- 56
- 10
fake
less than heavenly
Banned
- 214
- 10
he wearing OG 1's!! LOL at those fakes. hopefully his feet get super hurt.
- 2,748
- 139
no wings, and it looks like there is a jumpman on the tongue.
- 48
- 10
those are clearly patent(as you can see the reflecting light from the ceiling), yet do not feature the wings logo on the upper that the 03 version had.
they are fake.
94's are very dull and much higher.
they are fake.
94's are very dull and much higher.
- 669
- 10
They don't look real to me
- 4,180
- 2,778
Those ARE fakes
- 1,881
- 10
fakies... the shape looks off to me.
- 6,150
- 508
def. fake. that swoosh looks crooked
- 744
- 17
there fake patents i believe
- 2,514
- 10
Those are fake PLs because the tongue isn't supposed to be black like those
- 37
- 10
Have a good feeling those are fake
But @!$? why would sum1 ball in a shoe made in '94 anyways
But @!$? why would sum1 ball in a shoe made in '94 anyways
- 8,306
- 725
They look pretty off if you ask me. The 03 patent retros were mid tops, not high tops.
- 1,344
- 12
FAKE!
- 5,107
- 377
- 417
- 10
Originally Posted by hightimez420
you can easily tell their fakes cause the patent leather 1's didnt have a j man on the tounge
