- 11,411
- 5,368
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
What does that have to do with the question bruh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What does that have to do with the question bruh?
Let's give OP the benefit of the doubt and say he meant 15* years.
150 years? id live life exactly the same what kind of question is this
maybe not have kids so they dont have to see their demise?
iono man, we are living in some pretty technologically advancing times...Bruh your kids even won't live that long this **** is stupid as hell
IT is likely the first person who will live to be 1,000 years old is already alive today.
This is according to a growing regiment of researchers who believe a biological revolution enabling humans to experience everlasting youthfulness is just around the corner.
At the epicentre of the research is Aubrey de Grey — a Cambridge gerontologist and co-founder or the California-based Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence(SENS) Research Foundation.
“The first thing I want to do is get rid of the use of this word immortality, because it’s enormously damaging, it is not just wrong, it is damaging,” he told Motherboard.
“It means zero risk of death from any cause — whereas I just work on one particular cause of death, namely ageing.”
http://www.news.com.au/technology/s...g/news-story/d86c96b4f91639d0fbf3424a94f061b4
You and OP need to pass that my way
wouldnt it be ironic if advances in medical technology allowed us to live to 150+ years only for us to be killed by the asteroid?
Well that's the difference between a hypothetical stipulating this asteroid destroying all life on Earth [emoji]127758[/emoji] is a guarantee and fighting for a planet and future we can still protect.If it won't affect you in your lifetime, oh? But why even care about climate change at all, put aside the asteroid conversation? (what we're going to be planning for in the near future will be to stave off/support the drastic effects in the future for our children...)
Think about how people accost Congress for not holding a broader, longer view. So if it doesn't affect you personally that an asteroid will hit our planet in 150 years you won't change a thing about your own conduct? (But your grandkids - just two generations down, think of you and your grandpa)... Not even about what you might to do garner public support to get people rallying around a plan for appealing to policymakers, etc., which is not a life-changing alteration like altering your career course or something.
Whether I cared or not it wouldn't matter in this context. You're dead.For all of you saying you don't care would you be fine with your dead body being tossed naked into a dirt hole or fed to wolves? It's the same concept you're gone so what does it matter anyway right?