Before I even offer a rebuttal how about you explain how evolution is "flawed".
It's a theory, but not for the reasons you're thinking, it's a theory because despite all the biological and anthropological data that we have we've collected there's still an immense for us to learn.
but that doesn't mean there isn't substantial evidence that evolution is a solid theory.
And it doesn't hurt that its backed by biology. Mutation is real as is natural selection.
How is it difficult to see that life is a process, a process that never stops adapting to its environment.
And that our ancestors through millions of years slowly adapted anatomically. This is natural selection at work, if life didn't adapt it died.
We didn't just fall out of an ape's *** one day.
It's flawed in the sense that under its own parameters it can't explain how early homoerectus evolved into modern day homosapien. There's a huge missing gap, in the explanation process, and without an agenda it would've fell to the wayside long ago. It's also flawed like I said because what we were supposed to have evolved to, already existed when evolution supposedly begins.
For the most part I agree with everything you said. This stuff Is just theoretical and a stab in the dark to figure something out. However, if it's wrong there's no point in building a foundation of knowledge on something with a corrupt core.
Just like Einsteins theory of relativity. For years it held up, but quantum physics is figuring out that he had it wrong, and quite wrong at that. If I remember quickly even Einstein said it was the biggest blunder of his career and spent the latter years of his life trying to figure it out.
My point is this, they're just theories. Educated belief systems. When we start battling over beliefs, were right back where religion put us.
