computersputin
formerly arrowcollarman
- 3,911
- 4,066
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2014
People arguing just to argue at this point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Committing crimes and then alluding to them should be protected
Committing crimes and then intimately detailing them, should not
It’s like, people are conflating 10 different points. It’s obvious that if *****s did wrong, and they have evidence…then of course pursue that.
Vague rap lyrics should not matter, or be used as evidence. It should be “protected speech”
It’s this simple to me. This is the damn point.
Guess these same people should be ok with cops entering your home without a warrant but because they found illegal weapons you should still be charged because now they have real evidence.
I’m Innocent AND I’m gone sue
No matter if some of it is true, creating a song is no different than writing a script for a movie.... how can you use that as evidence?
Evidence is evidence of the crime committed... a song is a piece of art. Ultimately if they did it, it needs to be proven with actual evidence.
All those details. He flat out told on himselfThis is what I mean. Like this absolutely should be evidence. It's such a detailed confession it even ****ing rhymes
This is what I mean. Like this absolutely should be evidence. It's such a detailed confession it even ****ing rhymes
All those details. He flat out told on himself![]()
What is art tho? If i kill you and go on Twitter and recite a poem called “I just murdered @jpzx” how is that not evidence. We gonna throw it out because I said it was a poem?
at the end of the day, lets keep it a buck, people on here advocating for protecting criminals that are causing harm to other people.
oh he's on that kinda time.Yall know what computer is all about.
He doesn't HIDE IT.
oh he's on that kinda time.
![]()