Because MJ wore it on court. As opposed to a colorway he never wore releasing 5 years later. At least that’s the argument. Makes sense to me.
Cool grey 11s are still considered retros.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because MJ wore it on court. As opposed to a colorway he never wore releasing 5 years later. At least that’s the argument. Makes sense to me.
So Frenchie 7s and Cool Grey 9s are OG colorways in your mind?
Cool grey 11s are still considered retros.
Eh, I’ll let it go lol
I’m talking about the fact that 1995 and 1996 are different years.
It was during the same signature series run. What your saying is common place for all athlete signature shoes.
The game has changed.How can a colorway that released 5 years AFTER the original run be an original colorway?
The Cool Grey 11 is the only retro+ that’s better than all of the OG colorways.
Cool Greys are the GOAT 11.
Why is it so hard for people to admit when they’re wrong??? Big pet peeve of mineBased on the argument yea…but you’ve made your point.
New kids, man. Not the brightest colors in the box.I CANNOT BELIEVE we are debating this yet again
Please let's not ruin this thread.
To anyone who thinks an OG can be a new retro colorway released years after a shoe originally debuted and was sold and went out of production to be replaced by the next year's model: you're wrong. Period. No amount of caveats and explanations and arguments and whether or not MJ wore it on or off court will change this.
The end.
Bucks or Mavs not your flavor? Nothing beats an authentic MJ Wizards jersey and Bill Kennedy agrees.
There's always endless debates and disagreements about what is and what isn't an original colorway for a particular model.
An original will always be a specific colorway that was available during the year/season that Michael Jordan wore that model. Any colorway for a specific model that came out years later will never be an original, it's just an additional color option available for consumers. Nothing will ever persuade my to change my stance on this.
I'll always dread seeing Jordan with the Wizards because it will never have the same prominence like when he was with the Bulls. It's tarnished history that I prefer not to recall. Jordan on the Wizards was equivalent to Hulk Hogan in WCW in the '90s, neither was a good thing to watch because it was legends trying to extend past glory from a bygone era.
So is that the highly unlikable bootleg low cut patent leather on the 2001 originals that Jordan is wearing in that photo? I recall the dreaded low cut patent leather is commonly identified with the XI mid-tops that were released from 2008 to 2015. Can anyone verify if that crappy cut was on any XI mid-tops that preceded 2008?