- 3,989
- 4,120
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
Rick Owens. Saint Laurent. Acne. Vintage 501s.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Vintage 501/527 for me
I can friggen find a nice black puffer to save the life of me. No logos or anything. I want to pull the trigger on the prada one but it’s not really worth it.
Any suggestions?
Wasn’t sure how I’d feel about these but these are fire in person! Glad I grabbed em…
![]()
I feel it. I had the same thought mainly cause the air forces that were put out. But said eff it, I liked em when I initially saw em so I pulled the trigger.The light damier over the dark brown is nice but overall I just cant help but think of a Canal street knockoff when I see that print on a sneaker. Same goes for the AF1’s with that print.
so did yall have a 180 on monogram/logos/allover prints?
seem like it wasnt long ago everyone saying they dont want to be a brands bilboard?
I recently asked for some brand recommendations for geometric prints, but I underlined in bold “NO LOGOS/BRANDING”nah, no shots there, its a legit question
i stay with logos on my chest from guccis to pradas
a lot here were clowning em not too long ago though
this is probably my most worn sweatshirt and i have like different variations in hoody form
![]()
![]()
Nah they fire, pay that hate no mind![]()
The regulars are still nice lol .The sight of Amiri jeans/skinnies
![]()
I think people are delusional if they’re trying to deny that’s the purpose of wearing a bland clothing piece with blatant branding of a very expensive brand
That makes sense. Even though clothing design isn’t my forte, some basic design principles apply. It seems (and I’d love correction here, as again I’m far from experienced in this discipline) that outside of silhouette, there are few places to really change most clothing designs. (RO really is a noticeable outliner here-and that approach introduces a bunch of challenges on its own IMO).Sometimes the logo is the design of a particular piece if that makes sense. Some logos look good on the clothing, I have a Balenciaga denim logo jacket (on the back) and it just looks sick with the BALENCIAGA on it. The flex of the brand yeah yeah cant lie and say not that at all but literally the bold font, the color (its yellow on black) just looks fire. Same with Fear of God, I like their silhouettes and the way their oversized stuff fits but mainline FoG had some cool stuff with the logo on the back, got this black crewneck with a giant Fear Of God on the back and it just looks tough. Aint nothing wong in general with branded clothing, its when you dont do it tastefully (like Gucci down head to the socks in the GG monogram for example, or a black and yellow Fendi beanie with the Fendi sunglasses with the matching black and yellow Fendi sweater with the Fendi belt showing with the black and yellow monogram shoes) is where the heinous crimes are being done.
Classy flex.nah, no shots there, its a legit question
i stay with logos on my chest from guccis to pradas
a lot here were clowning em not too long ago though
this is probably my most worn sweatshirt and i have like different variations in hoody form
![]()
![]()