- May 29, 2006
- 189
- 10
This would make many people reconsider regional flights from NYc to Boston, DC, Philly. Especially when you add up travel time to the airport and airport security.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The same free market that’s known about climate change at the hands of big oil since the 70s but has published a false agenda in order to preserve their interests?In short, the Green New Deal would be a deficit financed expansion of federal bureaucratic power to dictate investment decisions in one of the most dynamic sectors of the economy. Responding to the threat of climate change by growing the government and further centralizing energy market decisions puts at risk the free market economy that our nation has relied on for economic growth for more than two centuries.
https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/427873-costs-of-the-green-new-deal
Margins do not equal efficiency. Airlines are a loss business. Look it up, Airlines have merged not due to competition, but due to necessity. Airline travel makes sense to two industries, car and airline.aircraft are as efficient as possible, to a mathematical point cuz these damn airlines look at their margins like a microscope.
Unless you work for a car company or an airline company there is literally no reason to be against rail expansion.It’s bizarre to me the resistance to alternative, more sustainable, environmentally friendly methods of travel.
I’ve heard people ***** and whine about how they love American muscle and would never drive a hybrid.
Nobody is taking away your ability to travel abroad. Stop with the fear mongering when the only ones shook are the ones scared of losing everything they hold dear.
They don't know how to cook a frog.
Ah, we shouldn't give a **** about the environment because of your selfish reasons. Got it!ummm i like to go to DR and drive muscle cars both would be deemed unnacceptble in 12 years according to AOC.
Every time i step into one of these threads it's about 90% right vs Left, & never about the actual REAL weaknesses or strengths of the actual proposal. Whatever is being asked is like a footnote in the scheme of dem vs rep beef
Unless you work for a car company or an airline company there is literally no reason to be against rail expansion.
Unless you live in the way and imminent domain lawsUnless you work for a car company or an airline company there is literally no reason to be against rail expansion.
Every time i step into one of these threads it's about 90% right vs Left, & never about the actual REAL weaknesses or strengths of the actual proposal. Whatever is being asked is like a footnote in the scheme of dem vs rep beef
Just a little background for those not aware and might incorrectly assume this is something new that "da broad" boogeyman is responsible for.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_New_Deal
Nobody is gonna come seize da hemi because we built a couple bullet trains.
It absolutely does not say that.
Reading comprehension is important.
what else doesn't it say? this broad is COMEDY.
No it doesn’t. It plans to make them obsolete.
It doesn’t say we’ll come take da hemi and you can hop on the bus.
Reading comprehension is important.
(H) overhauling transportation systems in the United States to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector as much as is technologically feasible, including through investment in
- (i) zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and manufacturing;
- (ii) clean, affordable, and accessible public transit; and
- (iii) high-speed rail