- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
via fivefivenines link.Originally Posted by 18key
You just made a $549 come up
$100 Series 1996 Misplaced Watermark Gem CU
Gem Crisp Uncirculated. Misplaced watermark and security thread, "Figure B" as explained in Stephen Sullivan's excellent and highly recommended " US Error Note Encyclopedia". This is NOT the same error as the more publicized and more common inverted watermark/thread error, but is instead caused by the back of the note being printed on the side of the paper sheet intended for the face, and then the front being printed on the sheet side intended for the back. Still a quite rare misprint, with a high percentage of the handful known circulated, and with a high number of those damaged as, apparently, they were first assumed to be counterfeit, then inked stamped or sometimes torn around the thread by moneyhahdlers examining and or marking the notes. Priced at LESS than the suggested price in CU in Sullivan's nearly decade old reference guide.
Price: $649.00
Originally Posted by AirForce1King
via fivefivenines link.Originally Posted by 18key
You just made a $549 come up
$100 Series 1996 Misplaced Watermark Gem CU
Gem Crisp Uncirculated. Misplaced watermark and security thread, "Figure B" as explained in Stephen Sullivan's excellent and highly recommended " US Error Note Encyclopedia". This is NOT the same error as the more publicized and more common inverted watermark/thread error, but is instead caused by the back of the note being printed on the side of the paper sheet intended for the face, and then the front being printed on the sheet side intended for the back. Still a quite rare misprint, with a high percentage of the handful known circulated, and with a high number of those damaged as, apparently, they were first assumed to be counterfeit, then inked stamped or sometimes torn around the thread by moneyhahdlers examining and or marking the notes. Priced at LESS than the suggested price in CU in Sullivan's nearly decade old reference guide.
Price: $649.00
maybe not this second, but it will be worth more in a while, hold on to it, because idiots like me, purchase old bills/mistakes.....hold on to itbro:Originally Posted by jtc85
i work for a credit union and we had a bill like that a couple weeks ago. we determined it was authentic and just that the watermark was printed upside down. the fed does have printing malfunctions. it's rare but not so rare that it's worth anything more than the $100 face value
nothing is wrong with them. i was just showing an example of collecting bills, those are 1935 and 1957 silver certificates.Originally Posted by d3772000
^^ WHATS WRONG WITH THOSE BILLS???
Originally Posted by neukicks
maybe not this second, but it will be worth more in a while, hold on to it, because idiots like me, purchase old bills/mistakes.....hold on to it bro:Originally Posted by jtc85
i work for a credit union and we had a bill like that a couple weeks ago. we determined it was authentic and just that the watermark was printed upside down. the fed does have printing malfunctions. it's rare but not so rare that it's worth anything more than the $100 face value
SWEET!Originally Posted by neukicks
maybe not this second, but it will be worth more in a while, hold on to it, because idiots like me, purchase old bills/mistakes.....hold on to it bro:Originally Posted by jtc85
i work for a credit union and we had a bill like that a couple weeks ago. we determined it was authentic and just that the watermark was printed upside down. the fed does have printing malfunctions. it's rare but not so rare that it's worth anything more than the $100 face value
Originally Posted by AirForce1King
via fivefivenines link.Originally Posted by 18key
You just made a $549 come up
$100 Series 1996 Misplaced Watermark Gem CU
Gem Crisp Uncirculated. Misplaced watermark and security thread, "Figure B" as explained in Stephen Sullivan's excellent and highly recommended " US Error Note Encyclopedia". This is NOT the same error as the more publicized and more common inverted watermark/thread error, but is instead caused by the back of the note being printed on the side of the paper sheet intended for the face, and then the front being printed on the sheet side intended for the back. Still a quite rare misprint, with a high percentage of the handful known circulated, and with a high number of those damaged as, apparently, they were first assumed to be counterfeit, then inked stamped or sometimes torn around the thread by moneyhahdlers examining and or marking the notes. Priced at LESS than the suggested price in CU in Sullivan's nearly decade old reference guide.
Price: $649.00