In all seriousness, a GOAT convo has to have a set of rules.
The easiest tool to use is peak value vs career value and then you average out the two.
When it comes to peak value, MJ from 1988 to 1998, takes the cake. When it comes to career value, it's LeBron vs. Kareem.
It's a big question of whose best was the best, and IMO MJ fits that criteria. If we want to look at career body of work, then it's Bron or Kareem.
So right there, there's a degree of subjectivity which makes the whole GOAT discussion meaningless.
And IMO, the biggest reasons why GOAT debates are futile is because different styles of play and off the court sports medicine vary so wildly. If Larry Bird had today's technology and Len Bias didn't die from a Coke overdose, the Celtics could have won a few EFCs in the 90's and MJ's career would have been more like Kobe's or Lebron. If Shaq had trained as zealously as MJ, or hell, his role player teammates like Derek Fisher, we wouldn't even be having this debate.
Every one from Mikan to Wembanyama, was a great athlete and ultimately the GOAT question is unanswerable (and my and some of my close friends, over much beer and pizza, tried to build the ultimate econometric model and it still was inconclusive).
It felt like this...
Watch the clip 'According to the Gas Chromatograph the Secret Ingredient to a Flaming Moe is... LOVE?...' from the movie The Simpsons on Clip.Cafe. Professor Frink: According to the Gas Chromatograph the Secret Ingredient to a Flaming Moe is... LOVE? Who's been screwing with this thing!
clip.cafe
So I guess it's Kevin Love. Sorry folks, the science is unimpeachable.