- Jul 20, 2012
- 4,934
- 6,791
The 2017s look more gold to me but I'm happy with the 24s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can't front, that "lower" cut...
(2010 pair on the left)
Can't front, that "lower" cut...
(2010 pair on the left)
Can't front, that "lower" cut...
(2010 pair on the left)
2010 is a size 11Same size as well?
Thought about coppin DMV’s but can’t get wit the new mold at all.
So went ahead and re-copped these
Should’ve never sold em in the first place.
Can't front, that "lower" cut...
(2010 pair on the left)
Wow…Can't front, that "lower" cut...
(2010 pair on the left)
For the inflation cost convo does it apply when Nike’s initial cost included all the R&D and manufacturing to get the shoes produced? The retros shouldn’t be close to the inflated anyway because so much of the work to create the shoes have already been built and designed. If anything wouldn’t things be cheaper? Even if Nike made them like the OGs part of the cost would likely be how much hype/demand would justify the price. It’s why other Nike retros don’t get near the JB retros despite there being overlap between tech and materials usedIt’s gotta be a cost cutting measure. 97s adjusted for inflation would be $350 today and 2010s adjusted for inflation would be $290 today. Obviously, inflation doesn’t hit every material or product at the same rate, but it’s clear Nike wouldn’t have the same profitability selling OG mold and materials for $230 today. I would personally be willing to pay $300-350 once every few years if they nailed it, but that’s just not Nike’s business model now. And every release would turn into the 17 lows if that happened. Unfortunately, we’re either going to get bad takedowns of classics or not get them at all.
And folks got the nerve to say people are nitpicking
Can't front, that "lower" cut...
(2010 pair on the left)
Can't front, that "lower" cut...
(2010 pair on the left)
I am not making any excuses for Nike, I'm just presenting the situation to whoever has a 2010 pair that is debating splurging on a 2024 pair like I did.Nah, c'mon man. Ain't no excuse for this all the money Nike bringing in. This is literally false advertising.
The Royals I’ve seen ain’t even look that low . It’s like they’re gettin lower with ever release - Galaxies about to be clogs atp
For the record, I actually settled on a 10.5 for the 2024 Royals. As for the coppers:
Usually 10.5-11 (2008-2012 run and 2015 to today run) but for whatever reason that 2017 Royal ran extra small to me.Wait so you wear 11.5, 11, and 10.5 in foams???