- Dec 11, 2010
- 56
- 10
Definitely looking forward to the SC II colorways.
Fall 2011 Sportswear Cross Training Scans- Bo SC II OG C/W, Griffey jr & II, & Trainer Max (94&97)
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by wallyhopp,
- Start date
- Apr 4, 2003
- 4,184
- 2,800
Damn wally they really butchered the trainer sc ii, I like the fact we're getting one OG color way but their variation on the flag ship color way for the shoe is a slap in the face.
- Apr 4, 2003
- 4,184
- 2,800
Damn wally they really butchered the trainer sc ii, I like the fact we're getting one OG color way but their variation on the flag ship color way for the shoe is a slap in the face.
- Feb 5, 2009
- 14,370
- 243
Oh my Gawd...
The Trainer #%+!**+ Max (97) is BACK!
Been waiting a long time for those (I don't $%@* with ebay).
Props Hopps.
The Trainer #%+!**+ Max (97) is BACK!
Been waiting a long time for those (I don't $%@* with ebay).
- Feb 5, 2009
- 14,370
- 243
Oh my Gawd...
The Trainer #%+!**+ Max (97) is BACK!
Been waiting a long time for those (I don't $%@* with ebay).
Props Hopps.
The Trainer #%+!**+ Max (97) is BACK!
Been waiting a long time for those (I don't $%@* with ebay).
Lake Shore Drive
formerly slp product
- Feb 8, 2005
- 7,336
- 2,445
This is the first time I ever said this but the air bubbles on the trainer max are really disappointing
.
My homebo used to have these back n the days and they had a ridunkulous bubble, we used to roast his short a$s saying it added 3 inches to his height
The shoe literally had a picture of a bulldog inside the air chamber sorta like the Deon's how it used to have a picture of him inside the bubble pocket.
My homebo used to have these back n the days and they had a ridunkulous bubble, we used to roast his short a$s saying it added 3 inches to his height
The shoe literally had a picture of a bulldog inside the air chamber sorta like the Deon's how it used to have a picture of him inside the bubble pocket.
Lake Shore Drive
formerly slp product
- Feb 8, 2005
- 7,336
- 2,445
This is the first time I ever said this but the air bubbles on the trainer max are really disappointing
.
My homebo used to have these back n the days and they had a ridunkulous bubble, we used to roast his short a$s saying it added 3 inches to his height
The shoe literally had a picture of a bulldog inside the air chamber sorta like the Deon's how it used to have a picture of him inside the bubble pocket.
My homebo used to have these back n the days and they had a ridunkulous bubble, we used to roast his short a$s saying it added 3 inches to his height
The shoe literally had a picture of a bulldog inside the air chamber sorta like the Deon's how it used to have a picture of him inside the bubble pocket.
- May 15, 2003
- 56,658
- 65,606
The only ones I like are the Air Trainer II's
- May 15, 2003
- 56,658
- 65,606
The only ones I like are the Air Trainer II's
- Dec 10, 2006
- 2,932
- 1,119
From the looks of the scan the heel plate, tongue and heel mesh.Originally Posted by Mayhemgatz
other than the black tongue being changed to white, i can't point out any differences from the scan....
Wally, what changed on 'em? (btw...u OD'ing on info is much appreciated)
wouldn't mind seeing the trainer max in that alpha trainer cw to the right of the blue pair
I get a flashback of the Pro Strongs. By themselves they don't look too butchered. When I unboxed them and look at my OGs they got returned.
I suppose if this CW were one that people were looking forward too than so be it. To me, the changes make an already mediocre shoe less desirable.
- Dec 10, 2006
- 2,932
- 1,119
From the looks of the scan the heel plate, tongue and heel mesh.Originally Posted by Mayhemgatz
other than the black tongue being changed to white, i can't point out any differences from the scan....
Wally, what changed on 'em? (btw...u OD'ing on info is much appreciated)
wouldn't mind seeing the trainer max in that alpha trainer cw to the right of the blue pair
I get a flashback of the Pro Strongs. By themselves they don't look too butchered. When I unboxed them and look at my OGs they got returned.
I suppose if this CW were one that people were looking forward too than so be it. To me, the changes make an already mediocre shoe less desirable.
- Oct 6, 2009
- 7,072
- 11
Thank You.
- Oct 6, 2009
- 7,072
- 11
Thank You.
- Oct 22, 2004
- 5,409
- 923
They dropped the ball with those Trainer SC II colorways. There was a neon/tealish colorway back in the day that would be incredible if retroed correctly.
- Oct 22, 2004
- 5,409
- 923
They dropped the ball with those Trainer SC II colorways. There was a neon/tealish colorway back in the day that would be incredible if retroed correctly.
big jugg shawty
Banned
- Feb 4, 2009
- 713
- 10
WhoaHooooYo!! looks like griffey bout to make a killin in the fall...ay count me in
big jugg shawty
Banned
- Feb 4, 2009
- 713
- 10
WhoaHooooYo!! looks like griffey bout to make a killin in the fall...ay count me in
- Sep 21, 2006
- 11,534
- 321
Cant wait for them AIR GRIFFEY 2s.
- Sep 21, 2006
- 11,534
- 321
Cant wait for them AIR GRIFFEY 2s.
- Sep 28, 2004
- 13,924
- 5,900
That's initially what I noticed right away. Maybe it's how it was scanned or photoed, but it almost looks like a straight black color like the GS kids OG model. It should be a checkered carbon fiber black and blue. I could be blowing this out of proportion but taking away a heel carbon fiber piece is something Nike has done similarly with other retros. Why not the griffey IIs? Question, for the black 2011 summer pair, is the carbon fiber heel correct? My instant line of thought was, some intern took a GS model from the back room and they spent all their time working on a retro based off a kids shoe, not knowing the Adult model was different. It's probably happened before.Originally Posted by heelntoe wit my nyks
From the looks of the scan the heel plate, tongue and heel mesh.Originally Posted by Mayhemgatz
other than the black tongue being changed to white, i can't point out any differences from the scan....
Wally, what changed on 'em? (btw...u OD'ing on info is much appreciated)
wouldn't mind seeing the trainer max in that alpha trainer cw to the right of the blue pair
I get a flashback of the Pro Strongs. By themselves they don't look too butchered. When I unboxed them and look at my OGs they got returned.
I suppose if this CW were one that people were looking forward too than so be it. To me, the changes make an already mediocre shoe less desirable.
I think you're right on the money with the mesh comment. Not to get off topic, but the black summer pair has some weird mesh.
retro http://theshoegame.com/ar...ax-ii-retro-preview.html
vs. OG
http://www.sneakerfiles.c...x-2-ii-og-black-emerald/
It seems to have a white backing of something inset into the mesh.
But that overall makeup looks decent. here, without a proper heel plate, what does this shoe have?
- Sep 28, 2004
- 13,924
- 5,900
That's initially what I noticed right away. Maybe it's how it was scanned or photoed, but it almost looks like a straight black color like the GS kids OG model. It should be a checkered carbon fiber black and blue. I could be blowing this out of proportion but taking away a heel carbon fiber piece is something Nike has done similarly with other retros. Why not the griffey IIs? Question, for the black 2011 summer pair, is the carbon fiber heel correct? My instant line of thought was, some intern took a GS model from the back room and they spent all their time working on a retro based off a kids shoe, not knowing the Adult model was different. It's probably happened before.Originally Posted by heelntoe wit my nyks
From the looks of the scan the heel plate, tongue and heel mesh.Originally Posted by Mayhemgatz
other than the black tongue being changed to white, i can't point out any differences from the scan....
Wally, what changed on 'em? (btw...u OD'ing on info is much appreciated)
wouldn't mind seeing the trainer max in that alpha trainer cw to the right of the blue pair
I get a flashback of the Pro Strongs. By themselves they don't look too butchered. When I unboxed them and look at my OGs they got returned.
I suppose if this CW were one that people were looking forward too than so be it. To me, the changes make an already mediocre shoe less desirable.
I think you're right on the money with the mesh comment. Not to get off topic, but the black summer pair has some weird mesh.
retro http://theshoegame.com/ar...ax-ii-retro-preview.html
vs. OG
http://www.sneakerfiles.c...x-2-ii-og-black-emerald/
It seems to have a white backing of something inset into the mesh.
But that overall makeup looks decent. here, without a proper heel plate, what does this shoe have?
- Nov 12, 2009
- 1,369
- 10
trainer sc 2 pls come in the lava cw!!!
also trainer max 94, i hope you come in the OG green white cw too!!
also trainer max 94, i hope you come in the OG green white cw too!!
- Nov 12, 2009
- 1,369
- 10
trainer sc 2 pls come in the lava cw!!!
also trainer max 94, i hope you come in the OG green white cw too!!
also trainer max 94, i hope you come in the OG green white cw too!!
- Dec 10, 2006
- 2,932
- 1,119
The Emerald/Freshwater retro is the hot one. The minor changes are going to be looked over without a second thought. Nike would have do 'an ATC' for these not to sell.Originally Posted by WallyHopp
That's initially what I noticed right away. Maybe it's how it was scanned or photoed, but it almost looks like a straight black color like the GS kids OG model. It should be a checkered carbon fiber black and blue. I could be blowing this out of proportion but taking away a heel carbon fiber piece is something Nike has done similarly with other retros. Why not the griffey IIs? Question, for the black 2011 summer pair, is the carbon fiber heel correct? My instant line of thought was, some intern took a GS model from the back room and they spent all their time working on a retro based off a kids shoe, not knowing the Adult model was different. It's probably happened before.Originally Posted by heelntoe wit my nyks
From the looks of the scan the heel plate, tongue and heel mesh.Originally Posted by Mayhemgatz
other than the black tongue being changed to white, i can't point out any differences from the scan....
Wally, what changed on 'em? (btw...u OD'ing on info is much appreciated)
wouldn't mind seeing the trainer max in that alpha trainer cw to the right of the blue pair
I get a flashback of the Pro Strongs. By themselves they don't look too butchered. When I unboxed them and look at my OGs they got returned.
I suppose if this CW were one that people were looking forward too than so be it. To me, the changes make an already mediocre shoe less desirable.
I think you're right on the money with the mesh comment. Not to get off topic, but the black summer pair has some weird mesh.
retro http://theshoegame.com/ar...ax-ii-retro-preview.html
vs. OG
http://www.sneakerfiles.c...x-2-ii-og-black-emerald/
It seems to have a white backing of something inset into the mesh.
But that overall makeup looks decent. here, without a proper heel plate, what does this shoe have?
The overall shape is there. It may be me but I don't like the placement of the heel plate on the retro.
- Dec 10, 2006
- 2,932
- 1,119
The Emerald/Freshwater retro is the hot one. The minor changes are going to be looked over without a second thought. Nike would have do 'an ATC' for these not to sell.Originally Posted by WallyHopp
That's initially what I noticed right away. Maybe it's how it was scanned or photoed, but it almost looks like a straight black color like the GS kids OG model. It should be a checkered carbon fiber black and blue. I could be blowing this out of proportion but taking away a heel carbon fiber piece is something Nike has done similarly with other retros. Why not the griffey IIs? Question, for the black 2011 summer pair, is the carbon fiber heel correct? My instant line of thought was, some intern took a GS model from the back room and they spent all their time working on a retro based off a kids shoe, not knowing the Adult model was different. It's probably happened before.Originally Posted by heelntoe wit my nyks
From the looks of the scan the heel plate, tongue and heel mesh.Originally Posted by Mayhemgatz
other than the black tongue being changed to white, i can't point out any differences from the scan....
Wally, what changed on 'em? (btw...u OD'ing on info is much appreciated)
wouldn't mind seeing the trainer max in that alpha trainer cw to the right of the blue pair
I get a flashback of the Pro Strongs. By themselves they don't look too butchered. When I unboxed them and look at my OGs they got returned.
I suppose if this CW were one that people were looking forward too than so be it. To me, the changes make an already mediocre shoe less desirable.
I think you're right on the money with the mesh comment. Not to get off topic, but the black summer pair has some weird mesh.
retro http://theshoegame.com/ar...ax-ii-retro-preview.html
vs. OG
http://www.sneakerfiles.c...x-2-ii-og-black-emerald/
It seems to have a white backing of something inset into the mesh.
But that overall makeup looks decent. here, without a proper heel plate, what does this shoe have?
The overall shape is there. It may be me but I don't like the placement of the heel plate on the retro.
