- 1,234
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
agreed with your post. the only thing i didn't like about bron going to miami was the whole "decision" that played out on tv - that, i believe, was totally unnecessary.Originally Posted by Seymore CAKE
Originally Posted by DubA169
yeah chuck was a 25 year old 2 time mvp when he went to houston
and your point is what exactly???
He was supposed to stay with a franchise who repeatedly showed they couldn't bring him the talent besides those on the decline??? He was supposed to give the best years of his career to them after he'd given them what he has already? I mean I hate to keep speaking on this but this man averaged 40pts 8rebs & 8ast a game in the eastern confernce finals and they were his miracle 30ft fade away 3 with 2 people on him from losing 4-1. Why would anyone that good stay there with that club??? You're just upset he didn't come to NYK, take the blue & orange goggles off. I don't recall anyone outside of Cle & Chuck making cases for him to stay so what was the incentive for him there again? I'll Wait.
i can SORT OF understand why people say his legacy is tarnished if he wins a ring in miami, but the logic is stupid, imo. it's been said time and time over, no one superstar can win it alone. last i checked, they do not get more of a favourable schedule compared to everyone else. they still have to play the same 82 games and the playoffs. i can't believe the amount of people criticizing him for wanting to WIN. there was nothing else he could've done in cleveland, he did anything and everything imagineable there and they still failed.