ESPN needs to be held accountable for things

Originally Posted by CP1708


Craftsy, good read man.
pimp.gif


Deadset, ya know Gammons was the first one that made me start questioning ESPN years ago. I had a friend here at work that was a Boston native, and he and I fought every single day about Gammons. I for the live of me never understood why they would hire a guy to talk baseball and in every single one of his columns, he would talk about the Sox, or a former Sox, or a minor league Sox and on and on and on. Oh, and then he would throw out a small tidbit about someone from the Royals or something.
laugh.gif
I friggin hated it.
I will never forget the giddy look on Peter's face when the Sawx won it all in '04.
roll.gif

Son didn't even try to pretend he was being impartial. Didn't he have a Boston World Champs hat on afterward or something as well?
laugh.gif

Can't be too mad at him though since it was Boston's 1st time in like a million years.

And yeah, good points with that earlier post Craftsy.
 
while we're on the topic of espn employees....why am i seeing stu scott and his optically challenged face on sportscenter? isn't he done? or was thatmis reported?
 
Just FYI

Here is a FULL posting from the AP on ESPN.com about how low enforcement wont look into it.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4349253

And this is exactly why ESPN didnt talk about this at all.

People want to bring up the Dirk and Pacman stuff but there was criminal involvement with both of those issues.






[h2]Authorities won't look at Roethlisberger[/h2]

Comment Email Print Associated Press


RENO, Nev. -- Law enforcement officials in Nevada have no intention of opening a criminal investigation into allegations Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger raped a woman at a Lake Tahoe hotel-casino a year ago, the sheriff'sdepartment said Wednesday.

Douglas County Sheriff's Deputy Teresa Duffy said the accuser would have to file a criminal complaint to trigger an investigation into the incident thewoman says occurred during a celebrity golf tournament last July while she was working as an executive VIP casino host at Harrah's Lake Tahoe.

5536.jpg

Roethlisberger

"The victim is the only one who can do that," Duffy told The Associated Press. "Unless there was a third party that actually witnessed theincident, which according to the civil case, was not the case here."

The 31-year-old Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit saying the Super Bowl winning quarterback raped her in a hotel penthouse across the street from the golfcourse, a claim his lawyer vehemently denies.

She also accuses Harrah's officials, including the casino's chief of security, of orchestrating a cover-up of the incident she says she reported tohim the next day. The lawsuit alleges Harrah's officials worked to silence her and undermine her credibility rather than investigate her claims.

The woman, a native of Canada who had worked at Harrah's Lake Tahoe hotel-casino since 2003, never went to outside authorities with her story, andit's unclear why she decided to file the lawsuit seeking hundreds of thousands of dollars a year after the alleged incident.

Her lawsuit says she didn't file a criminal complaint because she feared Harrah's would side with Roethlisberger -- a friend of thehotel-casino's regional president John Koster -- and she would be fired.

She said the security chief, Guy Hyder, told her she was "overreacting," that "most girls would feel lucky to get to have sex with someonelike Ben Roethlisberger" and that "Koster would love you even more if he knew about this."

The lawsuit said she was treated between last August and December at five different hospitals for depression and anxiety stemming from the alleged assault,and returned to work each time after treatment.

She sought legal counsel in March after Harrah's officials told her Roethlisberger was invited to play in the 2009 celebrity golf tournament and orderedher to take a paid two-week leave during the event, the lawsuit said, "to accommodate her assailant." The tournament took place last week.

Cal Dunlap, the Reno lawyer who filed her lawsuit in Washoe County District Court on Friday, said neither he nor the woman will comment.

Dunlap is the former county district attorney who also represents Nevada first lady Dawn Gibbons in divorce proceedings against Republican Gov. Jim Gibbons.Dunlap refused to discuss the woman's whereabouts.

On Wednesday, she was not at the property where she has been living in rural Douglas County. The old dairy farm about 20 miles from Lake Tahoe has a mainfarm house and several outbuildings, some of which appear to be rented out as apartments.

In a statement earlier this week, Roethlisberger lawyer David Cornwell said: "Ben has never sexually assaulted anyone. The timing of the lawsuit andthe absence of a criminal complaint and a criminal investigation are the most compelling evidence of the absence of any criminal conduct."

Harrah's officials said they do not comment on pending legal matters.

The lawsuit seeks a minimum of $440,000 in damages from the quarterback, at least $50,000 in damages from eight Harrah's officials and an unspecifiedamount of punitive damages "sufficient to deter" Roethlisberger and the others "from engaging in such conduct in the future."

Meanwhile, Roethlisberger intends to stick to his plans to participate in Shaquille O'Neal's new reality TV series. He canceled a news conferenceset for Thursday to promote the show, but ABC spokesman Edwin Escobar said in an e-mail Wednesday that production will proceed as scheduled Friday.

In the show "Shaq Vs." debuting Aug. 18, Roethlisberger is one of the athletes the NBA star will challenge in their respective sports.

Roethlisberger has twice led the Steelers to Super Bowl victories in his five-year career and is one of the biggest names in sports.

Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press
 
Originally Posted by WickedNikes

while we're on the topic of espn employees....why am i seeing stu scott and his optically challenged face on sportscenter? isn't he done? or was that mis reported?
I don't think his contract is out yet.
 
ESPN has an ombudsman, but I don't know what kind of influence the ombudsman has over the network.
A piece about bias or lack of coverage, sure, but how many people really read it and, more importantly, how many ESPN exec's take notice?
 
Originally Posted by jrp44

Originally Posted by RetroBaller

Peter Gammons is a legit Boston D-Rider
fixed
he might be from/like or boston or whatever, but he is unbiased. Hes not New England Comcast Sports/NESN D-rider bad.
 
Just FYI

Here is a FULL posting from the AP on ESPN.com about how low enforcement wont look into it.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4349253

And this is exactly why ESPN didnt talk about this at all.

People want to bring up the Dirk and Pacman stuff but there was criminal involvement with both of those issues.
Are you actually insinuating the reason why ESPN withheld this story is because of standards and non criminal involvement?

Because that was not the reason at all.

For the millionth time.....the Big Ben story was withheld to appease him and his handlers. Would every story be this way concerning him? No. But with a grayarea they do whatever suits their business end. End of discussion.


ESPN has an ombudsman, but I don't know what kind of influence the ombudsman has over the network.
A piece about bias or lack of coverage, sure, but how many people really read it and, more importantly, how many ESPN exec's take notice?
I don' think he has much. It certainly can't hurt though. But they are a middle man to field complaints and go over the month'sissues. I've read every ombudsman ESPN has ever had and 99% of their suggestions (light and strong) don't ever end up happening. It's fun to readthough.
 
^ They choose one for 1-2 year terms to write a column on their website "reviewing" ESPN's company and complaints/issues/etc.

If you frequent their site I'm sure you'll remember reading the columns, they usually have them on the front page and they do like one every othermonth.
 
Colin Cowherd said this morning they never commented on Mike Vick's herpes civil suit until criminal charges were filed. They didn't comment on EddyCurry's civil suit until criminal charges were filed. They didn't comment on Marvin Harrison's civil suit until criminal charges were filed... Saidthey didn't comment on Kobe's crap until criminal charges were filed... Said ESPN has a policy to NEVER be first to report or comment on these types ofthings... They'll gladly be second in line for these types of he said/she said crap, and they send out memos directing all their radio/tv hosts not tocomment or report on them...


Whether or not that's true, I don't remember... But Cowherd ain't usually one to sugarcoat things...
 
Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk

Colin Cowherd said this morning they never commented on Mike Vick's herpes civil suit until criminal charges were filed. They didn't comment on Eddy Curry's civil suit until criminal charges were filed. They didn't comment on Marvin Harrison's civil suit until criminal charges were filed... Said they didn't comment on Kobe's crap until criminal charges were filed... Said ESPN has a policy to NEVER be first to report or comment on these types of things... They'll gladly be second in line for these types of he said/she said crap, and they send out memos directing all their radio/tv hosts not to comment or report on them...


Whether or not that's true, I don't remember... But Cowherd ain't usually one to sugarcoat things...
Hmm... I guess I'm trying to remember a time when this wasn't true. It seems like they've at least brought things up in small storieswhen they've hit the AP, even if they weren't criminal charges yet.

I don't know... I can understand having a policy like that, it would be admirable. I just feel like they have to be contradicting themselves here, thestory is big enough that everyone had heard it without ESPN reporting it at all yet - and that means it's been a lot of buzz. Seems almost bad business asa news company to NOT report the allegations. Unless of course, you have something invested in the story staying uncovered.
 
Colin just read a memo ESPN told him to read.

They were on the Kobe news the moment it broke, I learned of the situation FROM ESPN. Remember, he hadn't been charged with anything, they didn't evenknow why he was arrested, they had Cossak on there sayin it could be anything from rape to fondling, they had no idea.
What charges were filed against Harrison? I thought that was just a big investigation, and ESPN was on it from minute one.
 
Originally Posted by John Sterling

Originally Posted by RetroBaller

Peter Gammons is legit
roll.gif

Most biased man on there entire network. Every single topic he speaks of he mentions Boston.
Common leave my man Peter alone.

Spoiler [+]
wpe2F1.jpg
 
I only go out of my way for two things ESPN related:

1. Bill Simmons' columns/BS Report

2. PTI

Everything else is useless.
 
Originally Posted by CP1708

Colin just read a memo ESPN told him to read.

They were on the Kobe news the moment it broke, I learned of the situation FROM ESPN. Remember, he hadn't been charged with anything, they didn't even know why he was arrested, they had Cossak on there sayin it could be anything from rape to fondling, they had no idea.
What charges were filed against Harrison? I thought that was just a big investigation, and ESPN was on it from minute one.
See, that's why I said I wasn't sure if I remembered any of it correctly...

I don't believe charges were ever brought against Harrison, and I do remember them updating every few days and whatnot...

The Kobe %%*@ was so long ago and so widespread, I don't even remember where I heard it from...
 
I don't even doubt they think they have some sort of rules and regulations. But the hilarious part to me is the fact that this is ESPN. They care about noone but themselves, hype everything, use rumors to fuel all talk shows, step all over the athletes they cover, give us minute by minute updates of the mostuseless info no one cares about, etc, etc, etc.

And the two times we have now seem them do a massive cover up (including memos sent to all employees warning them to never speak of it or they will bepunished) were negative stories on Brett Favre and Ben Roethlisberger.

Every media outlet in the country reported it. Except one single company.

Biggest deal in the world? Nope. Pure comedy? Yes.
 
Francesa's going off on ESPN about the Roethlisberger/ESPN situation right now

WFAN in NY, its online
 
They finally have something on their site now, a comment from Ben. "I didn't do it"

Article really isn't much longer then that.
 
did yall see ESPN top ten list of stars dunking on stars this morning

Lebron over TD was number 1

roll.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom